Clarky wrote: right ok this is where my PERP expertise come into play here

if you have a small enough distance between you and a wall to cover yourself and pull out a gun to defend yourself, you can shoot.

the entire idea of fearrp is to not endanger your life; this is not really endangering his life, as he made sure you couldn't just shoot him by ducking behind cover.

I'll try to get a video as a visual presentation of such theory

EDIT: here's an example:



This was from a PERP report on me which was denied, as my actions were deemed as acceptable and not risking my life. You can see I ducked behind cover, over a MUCH longer distance than Pug did, and shot him while not entirely risking my life. Considering PERP has much stricter rules on risking your life, if what I did was fine, then the warning given to Pug was totally excessive.

[quote="Clarky" post=907669]You was still under gun point, it doesn't matter if you were behind a wall[/quote] right ok this is where my PERP expertise come into play here if you have a small enough distance between you and a wall to cover yourself and pull out a gun to defend yourself, you can shoot. the entire idea of fearrp is to not endanger your life; this is not really endangering his life, as he made sure you couldn't just shoot him by ducking behind cover. I'll try to get a video as a visual presentation of such theory EDIT: here's an example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmGdbzE7Lx8 This was from a PERP report on me which was denied, as my actions were deemed as acceptable and not risking my life. You can see I ducked behind cover, over a MUCH longer distance than Pug did, and shot him while not entirely risking my life. Considering PERP has much stricter rules on risking your life, if what I did was fine, then the warning given to Pug was totally excessive.