Forum

Login to ZARP

Forum

[SSRP] TheCorgi Demote Request

View BBCode Back »

TheCorgi wrote:

Mobile Task Force Gunner wrote:

Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]

TheCorgi wrote:

Mobile Task Force Gunner wrote:

TheCorgi wrote:

Mobile Task Force Gunner wrote:

TheCorgi wrote:

Mobile Task Force Gunner wrote:

TheCorgi wrote:

I did mute the both of you for continuing the argument after being told not to.

This is petty, imo. You were both handled accordingly. And even though you claimed to have been satirical in your remarks and that they were "harmless" it instigated the argument.

EDIT: the reason you dont see the mute is because im a proper staff member that talks to people before they're punished. its a little farther down, bud.

The part that I found quite absurd though is that I was the one who was being insulted yet your multiple warnings mostly targeted me and not the other person, I agree that its instigating the arguement but im not the person who reignited the arguement 5 mins after it ended, And hell im not the person who was continueslly disrespecting throughout the arguement.

My warnings were given to the both of you. The reason I went to you first was because you were the one to continue it first after I said to stop. Naruto then said something as soon as i finished with you, so he was dealt with next. You both were dealt with. There was no bias in this situation. You are searching and stretching for everything that you can to "prove" i did something wrong to you. Nothing was handled incorrectly, sorry you're upset that I handled the both of you the way I said I would.

Your demote request has been proven invalid as it was mainly towards me being biased and not punishing the other user, which I already said both were muted. As well as did Eipus. Other than that, the mutes are valid. What else can I possibly get in trouble for? Nothing really.

Yeah definitely, a harmless joke response deserves the same punishment as a disrespecful comment which started the arguement in the first place, Even though both of us were punished equally, It would've never been an issue had you stopped him in the first place. But for whatever reason you were foucused on me instead of him which is what lead to the arguement being continued. Had you simply stopped him when he replied disrespectfully 5 mintues after the arguement died down, This wouldnt have been an issue. But for whatever reason you only took action when I responded and not him. I guess now a "5000 IQ" Joke and a "Suck a cock, Neck yourself" phrase have the same offensive power and therefor should be punished and treated equally.

The reason you were both punished was because you continued the argument. You both did. After my warning, you were the first one to say something after I made it clear that the argument needed to stop. You were both punished. There was no bias just because I decided to go to you first.

In the third screenshot you can see that he replied, That reply was 5 minutes after the arguement ended. I said nothing in the past 5 mintues and out of nowhere he wrote that. Whats more funny is that you only warned me to not continue despite the fact that I havent written anything in the past 5 mintues and hes the one who reignited the whole thing, Again had you just warned dealt with him instead of me right then, This would've all been avoided. He just writes that out of nowhere and im the one who's being warned.

And if you would actually read what I said, I told the BOTH of you to stop arguing. The reason I went to you first was because you were the one that said something to continue it first. You were BOTH punished for continuing the argument after being told not to. I don't get why you're so adamant about me being biased when you were BOTH handled? It takes two to ahve an argument, so like for you to sit here and say that you were doing nothing and it was all Naruto is kind of bs. I told you to stop arguing.

And if you would actually check the third screenshot that I suggested in my previous comment, You can clearly see that you're only telling me to stop and not the other guy despite him clearly being the one who started all of this again and being the disrespectful one. The biased part is when you're not bothered to stop him in the first place but rarther focus on me. Like I said, He's the one who reignited (The word "Reignited" has pretty much lost its meaning at this point) the whole thing with his disrespectful comment, Yet despite that even though I havent said anything you only tell me to stop. Thats quite weird, I havent said anything for the last 5 minutes and this guy just comes out of nowhere and you only mention my name? Im honestly not arsed anymore but all of this could have been avoided if you just dealt with this person in the first place instead of mostly warning me.

What you're not seeming to understand is, is that after I told you both to stop there was a null period. I don't have screenshots to prove it, but your screenshots are also lacking the needed information. The only things you've posted are in your favor. But after this null period, you said something first to poke at Naruto. That is why in that third screenshot you see me saying your name specifically. Which then you continued to say things, so I went to you and muted you. Naruto also said things after that little "poke" so I went to him and muted him. You're trying your best to prove bias, but there is none. You are simply only using evidence to better your case, without showing people that you were the first to say something after the "null period" in that argument.

You were both punished. I did not target you.

My third screenshot shows me in the top saying "Still", The arguement ended there and there is no doubt that that was a "Poke" Message against naruto, That was the start of the null period, Not the end. I thought I had ended the arguement with a simple "Still", This was obviously a joke against him but when I saw that he didnt respond I just assumed the arguement had ended. Hence why I moved to gang chat and just talked about it there as I did not want to start the arguement all over again.
But then all of the sudden he replied out of nowhere.

Im also not arsed to continue arguing here, Nor do I care about this situation anymore simply because of how easily it could've been avoided / how unnecessary this situation is. And I have to admit, I am being quite petty for a simple mute. But I think the situation could've been handled better.

-Lock Please.

BBCode

[quote="TheCorgi" post=906362][quote="Mobile Task Force Gunner" post=906358][spoiler][quote="TheCorgi" post=906352][quote="Mobile Task Force Gunner" post=906346][quote="TheCorgi" post=906342][quote="Mobile Task Force Gunner" post=906337][quote="TheCorgi" post=906318][quote="Mobile Task Force Gunner" post=906304][quote="TheCorgi" post=906295]I did mute the both of you for continuing the argument after being told not to.

This is petty, imo. You were both handled accordingly. And even though you claimed to have been satirical in your remarks and that they were "harmless" it instigated the argument.

EDIT: the reason you dont see the mute is because im a proper staff member that talks to people before they're punished. its a little farther down, bud.[/quote]
The part that I found quite absurd though is that I was the one who was being insulted yet  your multiple warnings mostly targeted me and not the other person, I agree that its instigating the arguement but im not the person who reignited the arguement 5 mins after it ended, And hell im not the person who was continueslly disrespecting throughout the arguement.[/quote]

My warnings were given to the both of you. The reason I went to you first was because you were the one to continue it first after I said to stop. Naruto then said something as soon as i finished with you, so he was dealt with next. You both were dealt with. There was no bias in this situation. You are searching and stretching for everything that you can to "prove" i did something wrong to you. Nothing was handled incorrectly, sorry you're upset that I handled the both of you the way I said I would.

Your demote request has been proven invalid as it was mainly towards me being biased and not punishing the other user, which I already said both were muted. As well as did Eipus. Other than that, the mutes are valid. What else can I possibly get in trouble for? Nothing really.[/quote] 
Yeah definitely, a harmless joke response deserves the same punishment as a disrespecful comment which started the arguement in the first place, Even though both of us were punished equally, It would've never been an issue had you stopped him in the first place. But for whatever reason you were foucused on me instead of him which is what lead to the arguement being continued. Had you simply stopped him when he replied disrespectfully 5 mintues after the arguement died down, This wouldnt have been an issue. But for whatever reason you only took action when I responded and not him. I guess now a "5000 IQ" Joke and a "Suck a cock, Neck yourself" phrase have the same offensive power and therefor should be punished and treated equally.[/quote]

The reason you were both punished was because you continued the argument. You both did. After my warning, you were the first one to say something after I made it clear that the argument needed to stop. You were both punished. There was no bias just because I decided to go to you first.[/quote]
In the third screenshot you can see that he replied, That reply was 5 minutes after the arguement ended. I said nothing in the past 5 mintues and out of nowhere he wrote that. Whats more funny is that you only warned me to not continue despite the fact that I havent written anything in the past 5 mintues and hes the one who reignited the whole thing, Again had you just warned dealt with him instead of me right then, This would've all been avoided. He just writes that out of nowhere and im the one who's being warned.[/quote]

And if you would actually read what I said, I told the BOTH of you to stop arguing. The reason I went to you first was because you were the one that said something to continue it first. You were BOTH punished for continuing the argument after being told not to. I don't get why you're so adamant about me being biased when you were BOTH handled? It takes two to ahve an argument, so like for you to sit here and say that you were doing nothing and it was all Naruto is kind of bs. I told you to stop arguing.[/quote]
And if you would actually check the third screenshot that I suggested in my previous comment, You can clearly see that you're only telling me to stop and not the other guy despite him clearly being the one who started all of this again and being the disrespectful one. The biased part is when you're not bothered to stop him in the first place but rarther focus on me. Like I said, He's the one who reignited (The word "Reignited" has pretty much lost its meaning at this point) the whole thing with his disrespectful comment, Yet despite that even though I havent said anything you only tell me to stop. Thats quite weird, I havent said anything for the last 5 minutes and this guy just comes out of nowhere and you only mention my name? Im honestly not arsed anymore but all of this could have been avoided if you just dealt with this person in the first place instead of mostly warning me.[/spoiler][/quote]

What you're not seeming to understand is, is that after I told you both to stop there was a null period. I don't have screenshots to prove it, but your screenshots are also lacking the needed information. The only things you've posted are in your favor. But after this null period, you said something first to poke at Naruto. That is why in that third screenshot you see me saying your name specifically. Which then you continued to say things, so I went to you and muted you. Naruto also said things after that little "poke" so I went to him and muted him. You're trying your best to prove bias, but there is none. You are simply only using evidence to better your case, without showing people that you were the first to say something after the "null period" in that argument.

You were both punished. I did not target you.[/quote]
My third screenshot shows me in the top saying "Still", The arguement ended there and there is no doubt that that was a "Poke" Message against naruto, That was the start of the null period, Not the end. I thought I had ended the arguement with a simple "Still", This was obviously a joke against him but when I saw that he didnt respond I just assumed the arguement had ended. Hence why I moved to gang chat and just talked about it there as I did not want to start the arguement all over again.
But then all of the sudden he replied out of nowhere.

Im also not arsed to continue arguing here, Nor do I care about this situation anymore simply because of how easily it could've been avoided / how unnecessary this situation is. And I have to admit, I am being quite petty for a simple mute. But I think the situation could've been handled better.

-Lock Please.

Forum

[SSRP] TheCorgi Demote Request

View BBCode Back »

BBCode

Quick Menu

Menu

118 PLAYERS ONLINE

ZARP Discord & Steam Group