Forum

Login to ZARP

View BBCode Back »

Mobile Task Force Gunner wrote:

TheCorgi wrote:

Mobile Task Force Gunner wrote:

TheCorgi wrote:

I did mute the both of you for continuing the argument after being told not to.

This is petty, imo. You were both handled accordingly. And even though you claimed to have been satirical in your remarks and that they were "harmless" it instigated the argument.

EDIT: the reason you dont see the mute is because im a proper staff member that talks to people before they're punished. its a little farther down, bud.

The part that I found quite absurd though is that I was the one who was being insulted yet your multiple warnings mostly targeted me and not the other person, I agree that its instigating the arguement but im not the person who reignited the arguement 5 mins after it ended, And hell im not the person who was continueslly disrespecting throughout the arguement.

My warnings were given to the both of you. The reason I went to you first was because you were the one to continue it first after I said to stop. Naruto then said something as soon as i finished with you, so he was dealt with next. You both were dealt with. There was no bias in this situation. You are searching and stretching for everything that you can to "prove" i did something wrong to you. Nothing was handled incorrectly, sorry you're upset that I handled the both of you the way I said I would.

Your demote request has been proven invalid as it was mainly towards me being biased and not punishing the other user, which I already said both were muted. As well as did Eipus. Other than that, the mutes are valid. What else can I possibly get in trouble for? Nothing really.

Yeah definitely, a harmless joke response deserves the same punishment as a disrespecful comment which started the arguement in the first place, Even though both of us were punished equally, It would've never been an issue had you stopped him in the first place. But for whatever reason you were foucused on me instead of him which is what lead to the arguement being continued. Had you simply stopped him when he replied disrespectfully 5 mintues after the arguement died down, This wouldnt have been an issue. But for whatever reason you only took action when I responded and not him. I guess now a "5000 IQ" Joke and a "Suck a cock, Neck yourself" phrase have the same offensive power and therefor should be punished and treated equally.

The reason you were both punished was because you continued the argument. You both did. After my warning, you were the first one to say something after I made it clear that the argument needed to stop. You were both punished. There was no bias just because I decided to go to you first.

BBCode

[quote="Mobile Task Force Gunner" post=906337][quote="TheCorgi" post=906318][quote="Mobile Task Force Gunner" post=906304][quote="TheCorgi" post=906295]I did mute the both of you for continuing the argument after being told not to.

This is petty, imo. You were both handled accordingly. And even though you claimed to have been satirical in your remarks and that they were "harmless" it instigated the argument.

EDIT: the reason you dont see the mute is because im a proper staff member that talks to people before they're punished. its a little farther down, bud.[/quote]
The part that I found quite absurd though is that I was the one who was being insulted yet  your multiple warnings mostly targeted me and not the other person, I agree that its instigating the arguement but im not the person who reignited the arguement 5 mins after it ended, And hell im not the person who was continueslly disrespecting throughout the arguement.[/quote]

My warnings were given to the both of you. The reason I went to you first was because you were the one to continue it first after I said to stop. Naruto then said something as soon as i finished with you, so he was dealt with next. You both were dealt with. There was no bias in this situation. You are searching and stretching for everything that you can to "prove" i did something wrong to you. Nothing was handled incorrectly, sorry you're upset that I handled the both of you the way I said I would.

Your demote request has been proven invalid as it was mainly towards me being biased and not punishing the other user, which I already said both were muted. As well as did Eipus. Other than that, the mutes are valid. What else can I possibly get in trouble for? Nothing really.[/quote] 
Yeah definitely, a harmless joke response deserves the same punishment as a disrespecful comment which started the arguement in the first place, Even though both of us were punished equally, It would've never been an issue had you stopped him in the first place. But for whatever reason you were foucused on me instead of him which is what lead to the arguement being continued. Had you simply stopped him when he replied disrespectfully 5 mintues after the arguement died down, This wouldnt have been an issue. But for whatever reason you only took action when I responded and not him. I guess now a "5000 IQ" Joke and a "Suck a cock, Neck yourself" phrase have the same offensive power and therefor should be punished and treated equally.[/quote]

The reason you were both punished was because you continued the argument. You both did. After my warning, you were the first one to say something after I made it clear that the argument needed to stop. You were both punished. There was no bias just because I decided to go to you first.

Forum

[SSRP] TheCorgi Demote Request

View BBCode Back »

BBCode

Quick Menu

Menu

150 PLAYERS ONLINE

ZARP Discord & Steam Group