Miia wrote:
Kyber supposedly shared steam messages with Nick that I sent to Kyber where I said that I only appealed the ban because I thought Nick was going to be biased and accept it. However, I remember only saying (which is the same thing I said to Nick, who was the one who told me to appeal in the ban in the first place) that I didn't think the ban should've been accepted, because I thought what I did wrong overruled my apology, where Nick clearly differed in opinion (why he accepted the appeal).

[quote="Miia" post=905569][quote="DaAwezomeViking" post=905565][quote="Miia" post=905563]You were punished for discrimination which you know we have a zero tolerance policy on, i see no reason to remove the punishment. Regardless of any evidence Nick may have lost you were still banned for a valid reason.[/quote] Surely if it was first accepted then I was denied again for the reason of "further evidence" there needs to be further evidence?[/quote] Maybe i shouldnt be saying this and could be completely wrong but to my knowledge the only reason Nick changed his verdict was that he felt he had been biased when accepting the appeal.[/quote] Kyber supposedly shared steam messages with Nick that I sent to Kyber where I said that I only appealed the ban because I thought Nick was going to be biased and accept it. However, I remember only saying (which is the same thing I said to Nick, who was the one who told me to appeal in the ban in the first place) that I didn't think the ban should've been accepted, because I thought what I did wrong overruled my apology, where Nick clearly differed in opinion (why he accepted the appeal).