Miia wrote:
You were punished for discrimination which you know we have a zero tolerance policy on, i see no reason to remove the punishment. Regardless of any evidence Nick may have lost you were still banned for a valid reason.
Surely if it was first accepted then I was denied again for the reason of "further evidence" there needs to be further evidence?
Maybe i shouldnt be saying this and could be completely wrong but to my knowledge the only reason Nick changed his verdict was that he felt he had been biased when accepting the appeal.