Login to ZARP





View BBCode Back »

Raeker wrote:
Nikoo wrote:
Raeker wrote:
Nikoo wrote:
Raeker wrote:
John is pleb wrote:
I don't think you read the entire thing, the PD raid was initiated when I killed him because of him being wanted with and m202 out
I read it. Your argument is automatically void, though, because he wasn't facing you. He wasn't a direct threat to you, not even in the slightest.
2.2 Random Death Match - In order to kill or harm another player you require a valid role-play reason to do so. Crossfire is not an excuse for killing people nearby where you are raiding or shooting. This rule always applies unless another rule calls for an exception.

- Examples of valid reasons to kill another player:
The player enters a highly restricted area such as the bank vault or back of PD.
The player kills an ally or friend of yours.
The player attempts to destroy or steal your property.
The player acts threatening towards you.
The keyword here is you. As long as the player shows no directly threatening behaviour you do not have a valid reason to kill them.

If somebody has a rocket launcher out next to you, your gonna tell me thats not threatening?
If the guy is a few feet facing away from you I would almost argue that is not immefiately threatening, but an important difference is that rocket launchers both deal more damage and have a higher area of attack (sorry it's 4 AM and my brain can't think of words), meaning people a few feet away from where the rocket lands can still be hurt by it. That is not the case here.

Besides, RPGs are a lot more intimidating than most other weapons, partly because of the possible damage they can cause.

He was pretty damn close to him with the M202.
I don't know the context from this video and have no idea how everyone got where they are, but I would personally not feel threatened if someone was standing so far (or close) away from me, looking opposite of me carrying a firearm like that. Take that with a grain of salt if you so please, but the fact that he screams "Rip hyper rip hyper" doesn't help his case - if anything it only emphasises the idea that he did it purely to rip a suit and is now trying to loophole around the rules to get unbanned.

This is why I say he should fix his attitude. Not because I dislike him (I don't even know him) but because of his evasive attitude where he tries to pin the issue on other people without ever having to claim responsibility for his own actuons. He had eight recent punishments before getting banned. Eight. It isn't that hard to not get punished, you know, and if it were up to me he'd already have been banned around the 5th or 6th punishment.

At least be man enough to say "You know what, you're right: I acted like an entitled cunt. Sorry, I'll accept the punishment that was given to me." I have a lot more respect for people like that than people that think they can get away with breaking rules and complain when it backfires.
why are you assuming my attitude when even you said you don't know me and you are basing it off of 1 video

BBCode


Time to create page: 0.072 seconds

171 PLAYERS ONLINE

Connect to server View Gametracker DarkRP
13/127
Online
Connect to server View Gametracker Deathrun
0/40
Online
Connect to server View Gametracker TTT
0/47
Online
Connect to server View Gametracker Bhop
0/32
Online
Connect to server View Gametracker Surf
5/32
Online
Connect to server View Gametracker Prop Hunt
0/42
Online
Connect to server View Gametracker Sandbox
0/42
Online
Connect to server Discord
153/977
Online
Top