- Forum
- Our Servers
-
Leaderboards
-
DarkRP
- DarkRP Gangs
- DarkRP Money Printed
- DarkRP Suit RIPs
- DarkRP Mayor Survival
- DarkRP Nuclear Launches
- DarkRP Bank Vault Raids
- DarkRP Bartender Tips
- DarkRP Air Drops
- DarkRP Casino Vault Raids
- DarkRP Drug Runs
- DarkRP Arena Events
- Police Armory Raids
- Bartender Customers Served
- Police RIPs
- DarkRP GENCoin Sold
- Surf Records
- BHOP Records
- Trouble in Terrorist Town
- Deathrun
- Prop Hunt
-
DarkRP
- Community
- Help
- Store
|
Login to ZARP
|
View BBCode Back »
Thomas The Thermonuclear Bomb wrote:
Most SSRP staff members only play SSRP to get as much time as possible but you need to get activity on 5 other servers other players have spent months or years trying to get LT getting as much activity as possible but you have a fraction of the activity they have and because you are "trusted" you get accepted i think you should stand back and let others get a LT position as you already have many.
You are most certainly entitled to that opinion, however, since I am getting a lot of activity on the server, and I am doing everything required of me on the server, I don't see why your point alone that other people should get a chance discounts this and means I should not be accepted?
Obviously, you are allowed your opinion, but if you could explain further, then that would be appreciated.
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ]
TheXnator wrote:
Where are you getting the idea of workshop addons? I do have standards you know.
My job as a Server Owner, and what is required of me is to get the server to a high ranking and keep it there. That is what the Community Team expect of me. It is only personal whether a Server Owner actually cares about the users on their server and whether or not they're enjoying it. In order to keep the community running, is has to be paid for, and from a purely business standpoint, the idea is for that to be made back and go into the community to keep it running, which can only be done if there are players on the servers. You may think it seems like I don't care, but I do, I am merely saying that you think my servers will die if I were to get SSRP Head Admin, however you seem to have broken from this point into telling me something seemingly unrelated. My servers will not be dying if I were to get other ranks, and if that were to become a concern, I would not put a second thought into resigning on other servers to focus on my own, especially Prophunt and Murder. Believe it or not, I do work hard on my servers, and both Prophunt and Murder had huge amounts of work and effort put into them before their release and up to this day from myself, my former fellow Server Owners and the staff teams. You seem to be acting as though I did not have to present an idea to the community with a fully functioning server and as though I didn't have to do anything in order to convince the Community Team to make these servers happen and get them running as they are, which is simply wrong.
Especially with Deathrun, you claim that I am ruining a legacy, despite the fact that I can make no decisions for the server as a Server Developer, my job there is merely to come up with ideas, talk to Annie about them, and then make them when / if Annie agrees with them. I am not actually allowed to put things onto Deathrun without running them by Annie first (aside from important bug fixes).
Whilst Para and Morgan may have had their ups and downs, if you also look at it from a pure standpoint of what they did for the community, they did do a lot.
I ask that you please stick to your point as to why this makes me a poor candidate for SSRP Head Admin, as your arguments are going off on a tangent and making attacks on people and trying to lessen work put in by various people. None of the arguments you have written in your most recent reply, as quoted above, actually relate to me as an SSRP Lead Team member or how I will do as an SSRP Head Admin.
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ]
Thomas The Thermonuclear Bomb wrote:
TheXnator wrote:
Para ended up a pedophile blackmailer who faked votes.
Morgan is an alright guy but he was CM banned
You also said That the idea of a server is to get high rankings, that's the most materialistic reply you could of said, do you think chute and emp worked so hard to gain high rankings although a high ranking is a nice goal they set up the servers to make people happy and for them to enjoy the game they are playing not just for a number in the screen to show that you are better than another number on the screen but to make you guys happy.
You are saying that your job as server owner is to get a high ranking for the server, from my eyes it isn't your job is to provide a good experience for other players making more players join from what I have seen deathrun is far from pleasurable now, I used to enjoy it a while back but now it just hurts to look at, other owners have spent months even years making the server what it is and in a matter of days you ruin their legacy old RE write everything that have done.
There are other well respected members of the community with server ideas and even fully developed servers that they have spent ages making and the space for a server gets filled with you just adding workshop add-ons to a murder server.
Thomas The Thermonuclear Bomb wrote:
That would not be a good idea, as clearly people with far more than three servers (myself, Para, Morgan) have done a good job across those servers. The idea of a server is to get it to a high ranking, as that means it has the playerbase we want from it, so when it has a high ranking, that means it is successful and I am doing what I am supposed to be doing correctly. The argument that "Just because they have good rankings doesn't mean they are good servers" does not make any sense, because it actually does. You can't get a good playebase on a bad server.
Did you say that you are doing a good job on the servers? That's a bit sad.TheXnator wrote:
Thomas The Thermonuclear Bomb wrote:
I would like to question what you mean on this one. None of the servers I am currently staff on are dying. All of the servers I have responsibility for the ranking / development of (Prophunt, Murder, Deathrun) are going up in ranking, and are at the highest rankings they have been in the past month, whilst still going up at a relatively good rate.
I currently have more than enough time to do all of my duties on every server, whilst also doing everything required of me and more on SSRP, still having time to spare, so I do not see how you can think that if I were to become SSRP Head Admin that it would damage any of my other servers in any way.
Just because they have good rankings doesn't mean they are good servers. I think staff members should be limited to three servers ensuring that they get a good amount of time over the weeks.You are lead team on 6 servers, ones dying the other one has never been alive another one has no staff another you have killed in a matter of weeks.
Just STOP and think what your ruining.
Just STOP and think what your ruining.
I would like to question what you mean on this one. None of the servers I am currently staff on are dying. All of the servers I have responsibility for the ranking / development of (Prophunt, Murder, Deathrun) are going up in ranking, and are at the highest rankings they have been in the past month, whilst still going up at a relatively good rate.
I currently have more than enough time to do all of my duties on every server, whilst also doing everything required of me and more on SSRP, still having time to spare, so I do not see how you can think that if I were to become SSRP Head Admin that it would damage any of my other servers in any way.
That would not be a good idea, as clearly people with far more than three servers (myself, Para, Morgan) have done a good job across those servers. The idea of a server is to get it to a high ranking, as that means it has the playerbase we want from it, so when it has a high ranking, that means it is successful and I am doing what I am supposed to be doing correctly. The argument that "Just because they have good rankings doesn't mean they are good servers" does not make any sense, because it actually does. You can't get a good playebase on a bad server.
Para ended up a pedophile blackmailer who faked votes.
Morgan is an alright guy but he was CM banned
You also said That the idea of a server is to get high rankings, that's the most materialistic reply you could of said, do you think chute and emp worked so hard to gain high rankings although a high ranking is a nice goal they set up the servers to make people happy and for them to enjoy the game they are playing not just for a number in the screen to show that you are better than another number on the screen but to make you guys happy.
You are saying that your job as server owner is to get a high ranking for the server, from my eyes it isn't your job is to provide a good experience for other players making more players join from what I have seen deathrun is far from pleasurable now, I used to enjoy it a while back but now it just hurts to look at, other owners have spent months even years making the server what it is and in a matter of days you ruin their legacy old RE write everything that have done.
There are other well respected members of the community with server ideas and even fully developed servers that they have spent ages making and the space for a server gets filled with you just adding workshop add-ons to a murder server.
Where are you getting the idea of workshop addons? I do have standards you know.
My job as a Server Owner, and what is required of me is to get the server to a high ranking and keep it there. That is what the Community Team expect of me. It is only personal whether a Server Owner actually cares about the users on their server and whether or not they're enjoying it. In order to keep the community running, is has to be paid for, and from a purely business standpoint, the idea is for that to be made back and go into the community to keep it running, which can only be done if there are players on the servers. You may think it seems like I don't care, but I do, I am merely saying that you think my servers will die if I were to get SSRP Head Admin, however you seem to have broken from this point into telling me something seemingly unrelated. My servers will not be dying if I were to get other ranks, and if that were to become a concern, I would not put a second thought into resigning on other servers to focus on my own, especially Prophunt and Murder. Believe it or not, I do work hard on my servers, and both Prophunt and Murder had huge amounts of work and effort put into them before their release and up to this day from myself, my former fellow Server Owners and the staff teams. You seem to be acting as though I did not have to present an idea to the community with a fully functioning server and as though I didn't have to do anything in order to convince the Community Team to make these servers happen and get them running as they are, which is simply wrong.
Especially with Deathrun, you claim that I am ruining a legacy, despite the fact that I can make no decisions for the server as a Server Developer, my job there is merely to come up with ideas, talk to Annie about them, and then make them when / if Annie agrees with them. I am not actually allowed to put things onto Deathrun without running them by Annie first (aside from important bug fixes).
Whilst Para and Morgan may have had their ups and downs, if you also look at it from a pure standpoint of what they did for the community, they did do a lot.
I ask that you please stick to your point as to why this makes me a poor candidate for SSRP Head Admin, as your arguments are going off on a tangent and making attacks on people and trying to lessen work put in by various people. None of the arguments you have written in your most recent reply, as quoted above, actually relate to me as an SSRP Lead Team member or how I will do as an SSRP Head Admin.
Most SSRP staff members only play SSRP to get as much time as possible but you need to get activity on 5 other servers other players have spent months or years trying to get LT getting as much activity as possible but you have a fraction of the activity they have and because you are "trusted" you get accepted i think you should stand back and let others get a LT position as you already have many.
You are most certainly entitled to that opinion, however, since I am getting a lot of activity on the server, and I am doing everything required of me on the server, I don't see why your point alone that other people should get a chance discounts this and means I should not be accepted?
Obviously, you are allowed your opinion, but if you could explain further, then that would be appreciated.
BBCode
Time to create page: 0.075 seconds
272 PLAYERS ONLINE
DarkRP
13/127
Online
Deathrun
0/40
Online
TTT
0/47
Online
Bhop
1/32
Online
Surf
6/32
Online
Prop Hunt
0/42
Online
Sandbox
0/42
Online
Discord
252/977
Online