Arctic wrote:
Justify your assumption, you can't accuse me of giving fake screenshots without proving that you were all in the right. Screenshots would be extremely difficult to forge.

Now as much as I agree that you're new to the job and such, but I don't agree to this:Arctic wrote: You evidently did NOT do everything right - which is why there's screenshots of unjust actions and failure in your duty of moderation.

I would have been able to account for yourself being new at one point - but now you've just said that I'm all in the wrong and you were perfect without even bothering to just admit your mistake and apologize - I have no respect for you being a mod on ZARP.

The proof is present, and until you can prove thatArctic wrote: Then maybe you should have thought about that. There was no reason to warn him twice, and even then just the little message in (OOC) giving the reason for the warn would be good.

You completely eliminated my other points from the equation, but they still are present - an apology would perhaps help your case, but choosing to ignore them because they have a possibility of being correct will be to no avail.

[quote=Arctic] 2. you are posting fake proof when i did all right you just make it look like i broke everythngs [/quote] Justify your assumption, you can't accuse me of giving fake screenshots without proving that you were all in the right. Screenshots would be extremely difficult to forge. Now as much as I agree that you're new to the job and such, but I don't agree to this: [quote=Arctic] when i did all right [/quote] You evidently did NOT do everything right - which is why there's screenshots of unjust actions and failure in your duty of moderation. I would have been able to account for yourself being new at one point - but now you've just said that I'm all in the wrong and you were perfect without even bothering to just admit your mistake and apologize - I have no respect for you being a mod on ZARP. The proof is present, and until you can prove that [quote=Arctic] 1. i used tab to warn him that doesnt give u menu wich asks for reason. [/quote] Then maybe you should have thought about that. There was no reason to warn him twice, and even then just the little message in (OOC) giving the reason for the warn would be good. You completely eliminated my other points from the equation, but they still are present - an apology would perhaps help your case, but choosing to ignore them because they have a possibility of being correct will be to no avail.