CrankyBot wrote:
I realise that, but as it's been said many times already, you should already HAVE good attributes before applying instead of promising them (in this case, people make those promises FOR HER.)

As I'm no longer staff, my vote doesn't count, I put my opinion out there in case someone feels the same way from the admin+ lineup. I've also mentioned this in my replies.
Svanzscape wrote:
Might've not been worded the same but the message is there.

My main concern is (MY OPINION) that people being blinded by this candidates gender is making them give a bias judgement.

During my staffing, and before that, I've seen better candidates get denied.

As mentioned before, as a staff member, loomy aint the greatest YET. I don't doubt she can improve, like others, but as of now, I think she should spend more time as a mod and kept a notice of her staffing capabilities.

[quote="CrankyBot" post=807870]Loomy has a whole week to prove herself that she can be admin material and prove her staffing roles well.[/quote] I realise that, but as it's been said many times already, you should already HAVE good attributes before applying instead of promising them (in this case, people make those promises FOR HER.) As I'm no longer staff, my vote doesn't count, I put my opinion out there in case someone feels the same way from the admin+ lineup. I've also mentioned this in my replies. [quote="Svanzscape" post=807717] I'd definitely give you more time, but I still doubt you'll get denied due to the current admin+ line-up[/quote] Might've not been worded the same but the message is there. My main concern is (MY OPINION) that people being blinded by this candidates gender is making them give a bias judgement. During my staffing, and before that, I've seen better candidates get denied. As mentioned before, as a staff member, loomy aint the greatest YET. I don't doubt she can improve, like others, but as of now, I think she should spend more time as a mod and kept a notice of her staffing capabilities.