TheXnator wrote: I'm a little confused as to how it wasn't constructive, as I was trying to come to a solution that will improve both sides? I wanted both sides to realise their errors and correct them

it may have had a harsh tone, but surely a harsh tone was needed to get the point across? considering you've employed a much harsher tone before (i understand why, not using it to take a dig at you) I don't see why this is so bad

the purpose was not to cause problems, and I don't understand how it could be seen as such if you actually fully read it. the purpose was to conclude all this bullshit and all the arguments so the community can move forward while not being so divided.

[quote="TheXnator" post=803666]Cranky locked it, this is why: [code]Contributions must be civil and tasteful. No disruptive, offensive or abusive behaviour: contributions must be constructive and polite, not mean-spirited or contributed with the intention of causing trouble.[/code] Your post was not constructive, and it held the purpose of starting drama / trouble on the forums. If you wish to, add Cranky on Steam or come on Teamspeak and I am sure he will be happy to talk to you.[/quote] I'm a little confused as to how it wasn't constructive, as I was trying to come to a solution that will improve both sides? I wanted both sides to realise their errors and correct them it may have had a harsh tone, but surely a harsh tone was needed to get the point across? considering you've employed a much harsher tone before (i understand why, not using it to take a dig at you) I don't see why this is so bad the purpose was not to cause problems, and I don't understand how it could be seen as such if you actually fully read it. the purpose was to conclude all this bullshit and all the arguments so the community can move forward while not being so divided.