- Forum
- Our Servers
-
Leaderboards
-
DarkRP
- DarkRP Gangs
- DarkRP Money Printed
- DarkRP Suit RIPs
- DarkRP Mayor Survival
- DarkRP Nuclear Launches
- DarkRP Bank Vault Raids
- DarkRP Bartender Tips
- DarkRP Air Drops
- DarkRP Casino Vault Raids
- DarkRP Drug Runs
- DarkRP Arena Events
- Police Armory Raids
- Bartender Customers Served
- Police RIPs
- DarkRP GENCoin Sold
- Surf Records
- BHOP Records
- Trouble in Terrorist Town
- Deathrun
- Prop Hunt
-
DarkRP
- Community
- Help
- Store
|
Login to ZARP
|
View BBCode Back »
TheCorgi wrote:
The Gamer Guy wrote:
Sorry that I put trust into those that are in charge and deserving of it..? Am I.... not supposed... to trust staff members? I'm taking his side because I actually spoke to Onion. I got his side of the story. That's why I'm taking his side. You're not any less trustworthy if you resigned. I'm just saying I trust him because I asked him about the situation and he told me what had happened.
As much as i agree with you corgi in that onion did nothing wrong please do remember onion is allowed to defend himself you going to this much length to defend onion to me seems like you're trying to suck up to a lead team member. TheCorgi wrote:
You're going to take his side just because he's staff? What's wrong with you? I have earnt a staff rank many times and have held it for very long times, I only recently resigned so does that mean I am less trustworthy?
Ashy wrote:
Unless there's clear evidence from both sides that shows the full event, I'm going to take the admins word for it and TRUST that he is being valid and worthy of that title. I'm going to put TRUST into someone who has gained their rank through it. Onion may have not acted appropriately but why should I believe such a one sided story so quickly. I have heard both sides to this argument and choose to trust Onion on what he says.
TheCorgi wrote:
Ashy wrote:
Well I don't ACTUALLY know what Onion saw. If he says he didn't see it, well then m8 he didn't see it. His word against Gamer's word. How else to explain it other than that?
So you're saying you'll believe anybody that says "I didn't see it?"TheCorgi wrote:
Onion says he didnt see your f1.. making it a non legit sit.. (hence the fucking around). Was also undercover doing junk.
I trust him.You're saying he didn't see the F1 even though Gamer Guy went on for minutes talking about handling his F1 and repeatedly saying it in OOC?
Onion says he didnt see your f1.. making it a non legit sit.. (hence the fucking around). Was also undercover doing junk.
I trust him.
Well I don't ACTUALLY know what Onion saw. If he says he didn't see it, well then m8 he didn't see it. His word against Gamer's word. How else to explain it other than that?
Unless there's clear evidence from both sides that shows the full event, I'm going to take the admins word for it and TRUST that he is being valid and worthy of that title. I'm going to put TRUST into someone who has gained their rank through it. Onion may have not acted appropriately but why should I believe such a one sided story so quickly. I have heard both sides to this argument and choose to trust Onion on what he says.
You're going to take his side just because he's staff? What's wrong with you? I have earnt a staff rank many times and have held it for very long times, I only recently resigned so does that mean I am less trustworthy?
Sorry that I put trust into those that are in charge and deserving of it..? Am I.... not supposed... to trust staff members? I'm taking his side because I actually spoke to Onion. I got his side of the story. That's why I'm taking his side. You're not any less trustworthy if you resigned. I'm just saying I trust him because I asked him about the situation and he told me what had happened.
BBCode
Time to create page: 0.077 seconds
290 PLAYERS ONLINE
DarkRP
21/127
Online
Deathrun
0/40
Online
TTT
0/47
Online
Bhop
0/32
Online
Surf
0/32
Online
Prop Hunt
0/42
Online
Sandbox
0/42
Online
Discord
269/955
Online