As Corgi has said, the user who is being reported's word will always be taken above your word if you are unable to provide any clear evidence. Onion is innocent until proven guilty, and you are unable to actually prove that he is guilty, so I sincerely doubt that this report will / should be accepted.
If you need Onion desperately, then he isalmost always available on Teamspeak, along with many other LT members, or you can message him on Steam in order to see if he is available or genuinely busy with something.

(In regards to the ignoring part, I haven't looked over the way he behaved part, just replying to this string of replies)

[spoiler][quote="TheCorgi" post=802688][quote="The Gamer Guy" post=802683][quote="TheCorgi" post=802682][quote="Ashy" post=802674][quote="TheCorgi" post=802671][quote="Ashy" post=802670][quote="TheCorgi" post=802658]:minussp: Onion says he didnt see your f1.. making it a non legit sit.. (hence the fucking around). Was also undercover doing junk. I trust him.[/quote] You're saying he didn't see the F1 even though Gamer Guy went on for minutes talking about handling his F1 and repeatedly saying it in OOC?[/quote] Well I don't ACTUALLY know what Onion saw. If he says he didn't see it, well then m8 he didn't see it. His word against Gamer's word. How else to explain it other than that?[/quote] So you're saying you'll believe anybody that says "I didn't see it?"[/quote] Unless there's [i]clear[/i] evidence from both sides that shows the full event, I'm going to take the admins word for it and TRUST that he is being valid and worthy of that title. I'm going to put TRUST into someone who has gained their rank through it. Onion may have not acted appropriately but why should I believe such a one sided story so quickly. I [b][u]have[/u][/b] heard both sides to this argument and choose to trust Onion on what he says.[/quote] You're going to take his side just because he's staff? What's wrong with you? I have earnt a staff rank many times and have held it for very long times, I only recently resigned so does that mean I am less trustworthy?[/quote] Sorry that I put trust into those that are in charge and deserving of it..? Am I.... not supposed... to trust staff members? I'm taking his side because I actually spoke to Onion. I got his side of the story. That's why I'm taking his side. You're not any less trustworthy if you resigned. I'm just saying I trust him because I asked him about the situation and he told me what had happened.[/quote][/spoiler] As Corgi has said, the user who is being reported's word will always be taken above your word if you are unable to provide any clear evidence. Onion is innocent until proven guilty, and you are unable to actually [i]prove[/i] that he is guilty, so I sincerely doubt that this report will / should be accepted. If you need Onion [i]desperately[/i], then he isalmost always available on Teamspeak, along with many other LT members, or you can message him on Steam in order to see if he is available or genuinely busy with something. (In regards to the ignoring part, I haven't looked over the way he behaved part, just replying to this string of replies)