Raeker wrote: I completely agree, yet a user that may rdm does not care whatever job he is at that current moment and will do it otherwise. We can further say that a threatening gangster's got as much chance to kill as any random job and as a result , a citizen, when all this boils down to rdm. Although I admit it's not a valid reason to kill someone before letting them kill you in fear of an violation of a rule, yet this is the result of a certain threatening presence that the person "transmits", which comes as a result of simple questions as "what would this person want here", "what are his intentions", "does he have anything that may result in me getting rdmed?".
As a result from all this syllogism. I want to say a warn is not fair, maybe a talk to so he is more careful next time.

[quote="Raeker" post=772792][quote="dankek" post=772765][quote="Grumpy Marshmallow" post=772720]someonne except xnnator hannndlle pls Name - leon21 #DankekForMod Steam-ID - STEAM_0:0:149672848 Evidence of Steam-ID - imgur.com/a/XuP7f Server - S2 Time and date (CET) - about 20 mins ago Other comments - kid is going for mod doesnt know the rules [/quote] that's not [b][i]him[/i][/b] going for mod, check the hashtag again. Handled by xnator , leon felt threatened and so he was not warned, since [b]grumpy equipped a milkor as citizen randomly[/b] in his mining dupe and with all the fear around rdming afk miners I can see why he'd react that way.[/quote] I mean, the mines are practically a no raid zone (with exceptions I know) and citizens have hardly got any reason to randomly start shooting people. When I was in a sit with a user 1-2 months ago I said the exact same thing you say now: the possibility that a user might RDM you is not a valid roleplay reason to kill them before the fact.[/quote] I completely agree, yet a user that may rdm does not care whatever job he is at that current moment and will do it otherwise. We can further say that a threatening gangster's got as much chance to kill as any random job and as a result , a citizen, when all this boils down to rdm. Although I admit it's not a valid reason to kill someone before letting them kill you in fear of an violation of a rule, yet this is the result of a certain threatening presence that the person "transmits", which comes as a result of simple questions as "what would this person want here", "what are his intentions", "does he have anything that may result in me getting rdmed?". [b][i]As a result from all this syllogism.[/i][/b] I want to say a warn is [u][b]not[/b][/u] fair, maybe a talk to so he is more careful next time.