Login to ZARP
|
JMT Rankin! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Name - JMT Rankin! Steam-ID - STEAM_0:1:18947617 Evidence Of Steam-ID - In the video Server - SSRP S2 Time And Date (CET) - 12/07/18 22:20 Other Comments - He does this constantly. its disgusting Reason - Rule 8.6 and and Rule 4.10 violation Rule 8.6 [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] 8.6 - You are not allowed to block or build directly around the mining entities. The closest prop should be three body lengths away. This means that three people should be able to stand stacked in any direction from the mining entities without being stopped by props Rule 4.10 [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] 4.10 Prop Block - You may block unused areas and entrances of your structures or bases as long as there is at least one entrance and no entities are blocked. Story - I just joined and went to check the mines and saw this disgusting behavior. Proof - Arobase #RoadToJugg [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Name - Arobase #RoadToJugg Steam-ID - STEAM_0:1:47606614 Evidence Of Steam-ID - In the video Server - SSRP S2 Time And Date (CET) - 12/07/18 22:20 Other Comments - He does this constantly. its disgusting Reason - Rule 8.6 and and Rule 4.10 violation Rule 8.6 [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] 8.6 - You are not allowed to block or build directly around the mining entities. The closest prop should be three body lengths away. This means that three people should be able to stand stacked in any direction from the mining entities without being stopped by props Rule 4.10 [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] 4.10 Prop Block - You may block unused areas and entrances of your structures or bases as long as there is at least one entrance and no entities are blocked. Story - I just joined and went to check the mines and saw this disgusting behavior. Proof - Baxter Backstabber [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Name - Baxter Backstabber Steam-ID - STEAM_0:1:43036610 Evidence Of Steam-ID - In the video Server - SSRP S2 Time And Date (CET) - 12/07/18 22:20 Other Comments - He does this constantly. its disgusting Reason - Rule 8.6 and and Rule 4.10 violation Rule 8.6 [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] 8.6 - You are not allowed to block or build directly around the mining entities. The closest prop should be three body lengths away. This means that three people should be able to stand stacked in any direction from the mining entities without being stopped by props Rule 4.10 [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] 4.10 Prop Block - You may block unused areas and entrances of your structures or bases as long as there is at least one entrance and no entities are blocked. Story - I just joined and went to check the mines and saw this disgusting behavior. Proof - |
|
Ex ✯TTT Head Administrator✯ ✯Prophunt Administrator✯ add me on steam: ✰Steamcommunity.com/id/lonelydodo✰
The topic has been locked.
|
Your proof for the last two may not be sufficient as it does not show who owns the props that are there, nor can you see who is doing what. For all you know, one could be telling the other to remove the props. But then again accomplice shit.
|
|
Last Edit: 6 years 11 months ago by Kyber.
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: spodermon
|
Kyber wrote:
Your proof for the last two may not be sufficient as it does not show who owns the props that are there, nor can you see who is doing what. For all you know, one could be telling the other to remove the props. But then again accomplice shit. You can clearly hear 2 sets of pickaxes going on in there and there was 2 people there![]() |
|
Ex ✯TTT Head Administrator✯ ✯Prophunt Administrator✯ add me on steam: ✰Steamcommunity.com/id/lonelydodo✰
Last Edit: 6 years 11 months ago by LonelyDodo.
The topic has been locked.
|
LonelyDodo wrote:
Kyber wrote:
I'm thinking of accepting the whole thing as this is, but regarding the last two reports I don't know if the miners should be blamed for the wrongdoings of the man who owns the dupe. It's a pretty unlikely scenario that the dupe's not theirs, but it's one we should consider. Your proof for the last two may not be sufficient as it does not show who owns the props that are there, nor can you see who is doing what. For all you know, one could be telling the other to remove the props. But then again accomplice shit. You can clearly hear 2 sets of pickaxes going on in there and there was 2 people there![]() |
|
Last Edit: 6 years 11 months ago by dankek.
The topic has been locked.
|
dankek wrote:
LonelyDodo wrote:
I am by no means a professional in SSRP but how do you force someone inside your dupe that is floating off the ground? If they were not forced in they knowingly broke the rules. Your call Kyber wrote:
I'm thinking of accepting the whole thing as this is, but regarding the last two reports I don't know if the miners should be blamed for the wrongdoings of the man who owns the dupe. It's a pretty unlikely scenario that the dupe's not theirs, but it's one we should consider.Your proof for the last two may not be sufficient as it does not show who owns the props that are there, nor can you see who is doing what. For all you know, one could be telling the other to remove the props. But then again accomplice shit. You can clearly hear 2 sets of pickaxes going on in there and there was 2 people there![]() |
|
Ex ✯TTT Head Administrator✯ ✯Prophunt Administrator✯ add me on steam: ✰Steamcommunity.com/id/lonelydodo✰
The topic has been locked.
|
JMT Rankin wrote:
they are not my props Proof ? |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
LonelyDodo wrote:
dankek wrote:
I'll rethink in the morning, my judgment is somewhat lacking after staffing all day LonelyDodo wrote:
I am by no means a professional in SSRP but how do you force someone inside your dupe that is floating off the ground? If they were not forced in they knowingly broke the rules. Your callKyber wrote:
I'm thinking of accepting the whole thing as this is, but regarding the last two reports I don't know if the miners should be blamed for the wrongdoings of the man who owns the dupe. It's a pretty unlikely scenario that the dupe's not theirs, but it's one we should consider.Your proof for the last two may not be sufficient as it does not show who owns the props that are there, nor can you see who is doing what. For all you know, one could be telling the other to remove the props. But then again accomplice shit. You can clearly hear 2 sets of pickaxes going on in there and there was 2 people there![]() |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
Hello Mr Ashur 2.0.
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
The possibility that they do not own the props is astronomically small. Disregard my last replies, they will be punished accordingly; consider this;
![]() |
|
Last Edit: 6 years 11 months ago by dankek.
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: eddie.
|