TOPIC: Question

Why did Onions post get locked over Clarkys one. It had more votes, more comments and more attention and ontop of that Clarky didn't make it a Yes & No question.

Links:

zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/darkrp/11...e-suits?limitstart=0

zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/darkrp/11...toward-special-suits

Idk someone came along and locked my post.

wdk someone came along and locked his post.

OnionRings wrote:
probably powerhungry clarky that wants to be the threadstarter...

Because the answer for Onion’s post is obviously a no. There is no reason to debate whether suits should get removed when the answer is clear.

EiPUS wrote: Yes, but people were also arguing about suits changes not only yes and no, a new thread was unnecessary when everyone knew the argument

You answered it yourself:

Aspect wrote:
This allows for much more open-ended discussion, and allows changes other than just removing them to be suggested. Much more constructive discussion therefore it's been left open.

EiPUS wrote:
I mean the answer isn’t really clear when a community owner asked me to make the post and said if I got lots of vote he would remove them in return of something. But I see them nerfing them.

EiPUS wrote: 54% Voted for Yes
46% Voted for No

It might not be a massive overtake but technically the Yes vote won

The thing about Onion's post is that there are only two sides to that argument: Do you want suits removed, or do you not? And although that question is somewhat reasonable, I much more prefer a more nuance approach where the argument isn't "Do you want this, yes or no" but "If you want something changed, how do you want it changed?"

You actually speak to a much bigger part of the community that way, and allow for a better and more healthy discussion.

EiPUS wrote:
Bad answer: Clarky made a post - Including some info, and ideas on what do change. But if you take a look at the comments you see nine pages of constructive posts including alot more info, which should not be locked. It's really unneeded to make a new post instead of sticking to one. That way you can see how it stacks up, so you know the community wants it added.

Because suits won't ever be removed despite what the community says so the title is mislead hence why I made my topic to make it even clear.

Clarky wrote:
Yet you put in 20 minutes writing a useless post, that would not lead anywhere? Good on ye'mate

Clarky wrote: inb4

RhysB wrote:
Like legit only the title “should we remove suits?” is just autistic. The thread was there to ask if suits should be removed which is the wrong question, therefore a new thread without an autistic title will do.

Raeker wrote:
I mean there was a third side as well and many people were discussing about just nerfing them instead of removing them and I was planing to record the results of the poll and write it down for EMP and then see if people wanted to see more suits or nerfing the current ones and no more suits. People were discussing other things.

EiPUS wrote: I don't think you know what autism means

Aspect wrote: I suggested CHANGES, not removal.

Clarky wrote:
That proves it. You suggested changes, Onion suggested removal. Yet you lock his post even after admitting that they're two different posts with different goals.

Clarky wrote: Thats not a way of looking at it, Suits can be removed and should be removed (In my opinion ofc) before they become too intergrated into the game. The owners wouldnt have requested onion to make a post about removing suits if they never intended or atleast tried the slightest to change it (Which I sorta doubt though)