TOPIC: [SSRP] Demote/warn request-mycherrycrush

Clarky wrote: What are you on about? This is a demote request, has nothing to do with the amount of unhandled F1's there are on the servers. Instead of harrassing Jaffa for trying to show a mistake made by a fellow staff you could make a seperate post urging staff to do their job, or message them over Steam or Teamspeak.

And although it might just be for banter, it is still an abuse of the slay command. I don't think it warrants an official warning or a demotion, but this should be noted all the same.

The slays may seem harmless to the staff member and player being slayed, but when other staff members are checking recents we shouldn't have to check to make sure every punishment is legitimate and not just for fun. These commands should only be used for actual rulebreaks, as they're permanently on the player's rapsheet unless a Head Admin removes them. While that sounds harsh you're not given staff to slay your friends for fun.

Staff Member(s) Name:

mycherrycrush

Staff Member(s) SteamID:

STEAM_0:0:28356585

What did the Staff Member(s) do?:

abusing the slay command

What server(s) was this on?:

SSRP servers

Evidence:

Raeker wrote: The fuck you mean by harassing Jaffa? I never targeted it directly towards him, I made a good point out as to why there's 10 unhandled reports and then I stated that they were probably banter slays (which they weren't from what I've seen in the newer posts on this topic). Revise what harassment means in the mean time because that is not what I did at all.

Clarky wrote: Harassment wasn't the right word, my apologies. It's just that you were seemingly disregarding the fact that Cherry abused his powers by stating that Jaffa should be doing F1's instead.

EiPUS wrote: Banter is never an excuse for abusing a command. Sure, we all have fun from time to time, but you should be fully aware that if another staff member calls you out for it that you should accept the consequences of that.

For example, say I ban you on Teamspeak for the lols. Of course it's just for banter, but if someone makes a demote request on me for that fact I will fully accept the consequences of that and even support it. Banter is never a valid excuse for abusing any command, no matter how insignificant it might seem.

Raeker wrote: I never disregarded that either, at the end of my post I would've reckoned they were banter slays, no harm intended until it was later said they were not banter slays so therefore it is abuse, we just need to wait for what Cherry has to say on here or to Roy the reasoning behind those slays. My intentions were not to attack anyone or the staff team, it was a curiousity and a good point I made.

Going after fellow staff members, mining and not doing f1s how are you still staff kiddo

Shark wrote:
if a staff member is abusing, you don't stick up for them just because their staff

Also they're probably banter slays so no big deal.