[SSRP] Demote request - yuno
8 years 11 months ago #365527
Staff Member(s) Name: Yuno
Staff Member(s) SteamID: STEAM_0:1:76905906
What did the Staff Member(s) do?: Break nlr
What server(s) was this on?: SSRP2
Evidence: steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=736349554 i was not recording so this is only proof what i have so they tried to raid our base and flex killed him when i tried to kill him too and he istantly spawns and tries to arrest me and arrested me
[SSRP] Demote request - yuno
8 years 11 months ago #365530
If it took him 21 seconds to arrest you after death, it could mean that he ran outside of the district and arrested you there, not enough proof sorry bud
[SSRP] Demote request - yuno
8 years 11 months ago #365533
mick19235 wrote:
If it took him 21 seconds to arrest you after death, it could mean that he ran outside of the district and arrested you there, not enough proof sorry bud
Not really as it takes time to go in the base and arrest someone
[SSRP] Demote request - yuno
8 years 11 months ago #365556
Hello,After i got killed by Flex inside elevator. I went out couse nlr. Near police station you tried shoot me with rpg and you was wanted.Then i tasered you and arrested.Its not nlr in my opinion
[SSRP] Demote request - yuno
8 years 11 months ago #365559
Yuno wrote:
Hello,After i got killed by Flex inside elevator. I went out couse nlr. Near police station you tried shoot me with rpg and you was wanted.Then i tasered you and arrested.Its not nlr in my opinion
you were running at me with arrest batton and trying to use taser on me
[SSRP] Demote request - yuno
8 years 11 months ago #365568
Helari wrote:
Yuno wrote:
Hello,After i got killed by Flex inside elevator. I went out couse nlr. Near police station you tried shoot me with rpg and you was wanted.Then i tasered you and arrested.Its not nlr in my opinion
you were running at me with arrest batton and trying to use taser on me
[SSRP] Demote request - yuno
8 years 11 months ago #365569
I've spoken to Yuno and it seems that Yuno forgot the district layout on SSRP 2, from what I hear this was a simple mistake and there is no proof to say otherwise.
Whilst it is accepted there is no need for further action.