|
Login to ZARP
|
|
RP Name: Mobile Task Force Gunner
Link to Steam Profile: steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198110218293/ SteamID: STEAM_0:1:74976282 Current Gametracker Profiles Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/player/Mobile%20Task...arpgaming.com:27015/ Server 2 - www.gametracker.com/player/Mobile%20Task...arpgaming.com:27025/ Age: 14 Estimated Server Time 530 hours Languages I speak: English, Hebrew, Little bit of arabic DarkRP related: Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario. Explanation: John Joins the server, He equips a weapon and goes out of spawn, He sees Chris and Decides to shoot him because He doesnt like that chris is looking at him. Second: "Bill goes to the bank and sees "Gabe", "Bill" Shoots gabe because he doesnt like how he looks (No racism) Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario. Explanation: "Chad" Got mugged by "Francis" And refused to get money and got killed, "Chad" Is not happy so he decides to Go back to the same district and Interact with "Francis" Second: "Mike" Raided "Steven's" Base but dies in the proccess. "Mike is not happy by this so he decides to go back to the base (Same district) And Interact with "Steven" Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario. Explanation: "Ross" Finds a base at the rich district so he types in occ "There is a base at the rich houses, Lets raid it!" Second: "Eddie" Types in OCC "There is a gangster That is killing everyone in spawn!" Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x. I will bring both of them and ask them for proof, If one's proof Outweighs the other's I will accept the person who had more proof. In this case: Warn the accused person If the Accuser has valid proof. If the accuser doesnt have proof I wont accept it, Or if the accused person has more proof showing he didnt break any rules. Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.: I will bring both of them and ask for proof. If the Accuser has proof that the Accused broke NLR i will warn him, If the accuser doesnt have valid proof then i will let both of them go. Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided I will verbally warn him using (/pm) and tell him to not do it again. Why I should be chosen (we recommend around 150 words). I have been a part of this community for over a year now, I play it everyday almost and I always support it in many ways possible. I would love to be a moderator to help the community and make it fun for players without having rulebreakers ruin their Experience. Thank you for reading my Application. Feedback Would be Very appreciated |
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
|
2 recent warnings 1 for disrespect and other job abuse which is no longer a rule
|
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
|
Macca Lad wrote:
2 recent warnings 1 for disrespect and other job abuse which is no longer a rule I agree with Macca on this one, although its not a rule anymore it was a rule when you broke it which means you either don't have a good understanding of the rules or don't care to follow the rules |
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
|
Plankton wrote:
Macca Lad wrote:
2 recent warnings 1 for disrespect and other job abuse which is no longer a rule I agree with Macca on this one, although its not a rule anymore it was a rule when you broke it which means you either don't have a good understanding of the rules or don't care to follow the rules This was due to me not knowing how much time had passed last time I changed: I became a black market dealer to place a unit printer, I stayed as that job for about 3 to 4 mins then I changed back Because I thought the timer had passed. |
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
|
Mobile Task Force Gunner wrote:
Plankton wrote:
Macca Lad wrote:
2 recent warnings 1 for disrespect and other job abuse which is no longer a rule I agree with Macca on this one, although its not a rule anymore it was a rule when you broke it which means you either don't have a good understanding of the rules or don't care to follow the rules This was due to me not knowing how much time had passed last time I changed: I became a black market dealer to place a unit printer, I stayed as that job for about 3 to 4 mins then I changed back Because I thought the timer had passed. you did it allmost instantly i was there at the time and also you were warned on the same day for disrespect which makes me stick with my verdict |
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
|
2 Recent warnings
Anyways, that what you said right now doesnt excuse the Disrespect one. |
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
|
Bump
|
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
|
Thanks for applying for staff at ZARP DarkRp! During our weekly staff meeting your application, question answers, game trackers and in-game warnings are checked and then the staff team votes on your application.
This time, the staff team have decided that you still need to work on your application and then apply again next week. To try and help you they have summarised some positives & negatives discussed during the meeting: Recent WarningsYou can apply again at any time, and thanks for supporting ZARP! |
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|

