|
Login to ZARP
|
|
RP Name The Duck 2 Link to Steam Profile steamcommunity.com/id/noahtyg SteamID STEAM_0:0:29981691 Current Gametracker Profiles Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/player/Hoblit/94.23.19.200:27015/ Server 2 - www.gametracker.com/player/Hoblit/94.23.19.200:27025/ <strong>I have old game tracker profiles with more palytime on server 2 (8k minutes on there) and 400 minutes on server 1</strong> Age 15 Estimated Server Time 14k on server 2 and 1,5k on server 1, 2h per day. Languages I speak English, Swedish and a bit french. Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario. Random Death match is when you kill another play without a valid reason, Bob walks up to Jam and kills him without a good reason. Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario. New Life Rule also known as NLR means that you loose all your memories from your previous life and you are not allowed to return to your death location until the NLR timer is gone. Jam raids Bob and kills him, Bob runs back and kills Jam. Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario. Metagaming some people like to call it only meta. Metagaming is when you use OOC (out of character) chat for IC (In character) stuff. Bob calls his mates in OOC for help because he's getting raided. Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x. I would ask for valid proof, If no valid proof is given no actions will be made till its repeated. If valid proof clear signs of rdm is given, A warning to player Y will be issued. Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time. First i will ask for proof too, Preferable video evidence. If no valid proof is given, No punishments will be issued. If valid proof is given that show clear signs of the rule NLR being broken a warning will also be issued. Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided I would fist verbally warn X for breaking the rule metagaming, If repeated i will bring him to a roof and make sure he knows what the rule mean, If the answer is no, I will teach him what it is then let him go with a verbal warning, If he knows, A warning for metagaming will be issued. You should choose me because i'm a former moderator of the SSRP server. I do what i'm told without complaining, I'm very experienced with the game and i try to help new people all the time. I speak fluent english and have a advance understanding for the rules, When i make my applications i spend lots of time in them, I'm writing fresh applications every time with new content. I can work in a group pretty well and i know zarp's moderator commands. I have a basic understanding of the F1 system and can handle it well. When i give warnings i use the steamid not nicknames because if i write like "duck" when warning The Duck 2, I might warn someone called like "DuckMaster". I have been a member of this community since 4 month back, I've had my times playing here but i'm here right now, thats the point. I know the most of the admins and the most of them know who i am. I have lots of patience that means i can handle people writing slow or are just slow coming to their point. Thanks for reading. |
|
|
Edited 11 years 2 months ago by Hoblit. Reason: Removed unnecessary GIF
The topic has been locked.
|
|
Weren't you CodyAdams? [correct me if im wrong]
|
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
|
khaitam2001 wrote:
Weren't you CodyAdams? [correct me if im wrong] No, I've always been The Duck 2, You might remember me as Hoblit |
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
|
Bring Up My Post
|
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
|
Cool guy, app's pretty good.
+support |
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
|
First and foremost, we'd like to thank you for making the effort to apply for a rank on the ZARP Semi Serious DarkRP. Your application has been discussed at an administrative meeting, and from there it has been voted on.
Unfortunately as more staff members voted 'no' than 'yes', the application has been denied. The meeting host has taken some criticisms made by the admins and provided you with this feedback: Disrespectful and immature, try and gain respect within the communityYou are welcome to apply again at any point. |
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|


