TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] The Duck 2's applicaton

Hi there staff members! Sorry for my inactivity lately, I've been busy in real life, It wont happened again! Wish me luck haha, Love you


RP Name The Duck 2

Link to Steam Profile Steamcommunity.com/id/noahtyg

SteamID STEAM_0:0:29981691

Current Gametracker Profiles

Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/player/Hoblit/94.23.19.200:27015/
Server 2 - www.gametracker.com/player/Hoblit/94.23.19.200:27025/

Old Gametracker Profiles

Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/player/Nonoswe/94.23.19.200:27015/
Server 2 - www.gametracker.com/player/Nonoswe/94.23.19.200:27025/

Age 15

Estimated Server Time 2h+ per day and around 9000 minutes on server 2, close to 1000 on server, I'm way more active on server 1 now! Expect my time to go up by 1000's of minutes.

Languages I speak Swedish, English and a bit french





Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario.
RDM is when you kill someone without a valid reason, A scenario would be Bob walks up to Jam and shoots him with a shotgun.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario.
NLR, If you get killed you forgot everything in you previous life, Bob gets killed by Jam and runs back instantly and kills Jam.

Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario.
Metagaming is when you use IC information in OOC chat. Bob calls Jam for help in the OOC chat.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.
First i will ask for proof of the rdm taking place, If no proof is given i can't really do anything, But if proof is given (valid proof) i will warn player Y for RDM then make sure he understands what he did wrong.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time. First i will ask player Y why he killed player X, If the answer is like "He raided my base" he will get warned for NLR. If a different answer is given thats actually valid, I can't do anything about it.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided
I would tell him in OOC that it's metagaming and is strictly forbidden, I would also tell him that next time he does it, He will be issued a warning for metagaming.

Why I should be chosen.
Why you should choose me? becuase i'm a duck, jokes aside, I'm a calm person that can turn crazy while roleplaying (wont go nuts in admin sit just when i like raid) I put tons of effort in my application and my english is also good, i know all the rules and haven't gained a single warning since my last application! This means i have been better and i (hopefully) wont get any more warnings! I'm a active player I have past admin experience, i have seen moderators/admins work on this server therefor i know how to handel situations good. I see tons of rulebreakers that i want to stop but as today i cant do ANYTHING and that sucks, I want to help new players and old players, sometimes i can also do F1 all the day! If i ever get on "trail" or something i promise i will do F1 atleast 1 hour a day (if i have time). I have past moderator experience, As i'm a former SSRP Moderator

I know that the last part was mostly just crap i wrote togheter.

Sorry Redwingz, Unblock me on steam so we can talk.

Past mod experience while u were breaking rules.
And when i caught u u kept swearing at me n killed me with slams...
But i think you deserve a second chance so i'll go with +- Neutral

Taco wrote:
I don't have any memory of that x) I don't do stuff like that.

Oh, i do and another mod saw it too i think i still have screenshots of it
But dw everyone deserves a 2nd chance m8

Update: I was just warned for NLR witch i didnt even do.

First and foremost, we'd like to thank you for making the effort to apply for a rank on the ZARP Semi Serious DarkRP. Your application has been discussed at an administrative meeting, and from there it has been voted on.


Unfortunately as more staff members voted 'no' than 'yes', the application has been denied.

The meeting host has taken some criticisms made by the admins and provided you with this feedback:

You are welcome to apply again at any point.