TOPIC: [Community] Solidify/new CM Election Policies

Not having to bump it doesn't get it far huh? This one cannot bite the dust so once again...
Bump.

Kemi wrote:
I'm pretty sure when they don't decide on stuff they either want more opinions or couldn't decide!

Princess Peach wrote: I'm unsure how these things are handled, a certain other suggestion bared its fruit almost immediately being taken into consideration and being handled with the week. I hope the CM team can get to this one or at least shed light on how that process works, after all, I'm sure we'd all love to know. This one's already quite old but I can see other suggestions such as this one going unhandled for quite some time as well. I hope that's not the case writing these things is... time-consuming.

Regardless of whether or not they want more opinions, I'd love to see more and possibly hear what other people can think of regarding new voting processes or any other part of the suggestion in general.

Kemi wrote:
regarding your policy change thing, though it was likely discussed, I don't see any evidence of it being enacted upon in any meaningful way at the moment sadly. I could be wrong, but deleting and locking seems to be continuing as per usual.

Justice wrote:
Yes, I am afraid that the policy did not quite get implemented to the level of which I would've wanted it to, but a permanent upcoming solution has been announced that hopefully will come in the near future which will definitely somewhat fulfil the purpose of the policy change, to begin with. It shows they are aware of the issue at least and are somewhat willing to fix it.

I had stated as such before in the [Community Team] Meeting Outcome which you can find here. Even so here's what I said on that postThe policies were changed to make it clearer for someone whose post was deleted to find out why, but it did not quite solve the fundamental problems that we had pointed out. Regardless, there's only a limited amount of stuff that we can do as normal users and any push in the right direction no matter how slight will hopefully help in some way.

We do, do our research into what we can improve and how to do it, however, our suggestions are only still that, suggestions. They are not well enough written out to be tossed into policies right away. They merely are there to point out an issue and suggest a potential fix, it is in the end up the Community Team to decide how to implement the changes to fix the issues.

Perhaps our expression about it bearing fruit might've been a bit too enthusiastic, and we did not mean to give the wrong impression about its effects, we intended merely to state that some level of change has occurred because of it.

a bump just in time for the cm team meeting !

Not to pull a Jordan but this one too needs a lil' bump,

_{I'd usually wait longer but tbf its been 4 weeks.}
.

so uhhh is this actually gonna get discussed in any serious capacity lol

what meeting even discusses this, it’s got to be the CM meeting if it’s due to electing CMs, but I am completely baffled at the fact that this hasn’t been handled yet.

Kyber wrote: Anything that has to do with policies needs to be discussed in the Community team meeting, including the demotion policy change suggestion

Nick0GR wrote: I'd personally want to put in the effort to make a suggestion and policies on how that should be streamlined, but I feel it'll get a similar treatment to this one... oh well, we can keep hoping. _bump