Login to ZARP
|
|
![]() This is already in place. Rule 2.2 is covering that warnings must be issued within chat. Rule 2.2b, a subpoint, goes into specifics that detectives can issue commands/warning because of their role, and because its a sub point, its clear that the warning must be a written one. What the hell. |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
Svanzscape wrote:
![]() This is already in place. Rule 2.2 is covering that warnings must be issued within chat. Rule 2.2b, a subpoint, goes into specifics that detectives can issue commands/warning because of their role, and because its a sub point, its clear that the warning must be a written one. What the hell. You even read anything i said? |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
BananaSlanger wrote:
Svanzscape wrote:
BananaSlanger wrote:
![]() This is already in place. Rule 2.2 is covering that warnings must be issued within chat. Rule 2.2b, a subpoint, goes into specifics that detectives can issue commands/warning because of their role, and because its a sub point, its clear that the warning must be a written one. What the hell. You even read anything i said? As users gets warned by staff for not writing in chat. Even though it doesn't specify in chat which would be hard for new users/users to understand I read plenty from that. I also read each of your replies, and because your reply to my minussp was retarded, I'm assuming you didnt read what I said. Let me dumb it down for you. 2.2 is a point. 2.2B is a subpoint FALLING UNDER 2.2. They are directly connected. Is that better? PS, I love how like 5 people said the same thing yet you picked out me lmao |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
Svanzscape wrote:
BananaSlanger wrote:
Svanzscape wrote:
BananaSlanger wrote:
![]() This is already in place. Rule 2.2 is covering that warnings must be issued within chat. Rule 2.2b, a subpoint, goes into specifics that detectives can issue commands/warning because of their role, and because its a sub point, its clear that the warning must be a written one. What the hell. You even read anything i said? As users gets warned by staff for not writing in chat. Even though it doesn't specify in chat which would be hard for new users/users to understand I read plenty from that. I also read each of your replies, and because your reply to my minussp was retarded, I'm assuming you didnt read what I said. Let me dumb it down for you. 2.2 is a point. 2.2B is a subpoint FALLING UNDER 2.2. They are directly connected. Is that better? PS, I love how like 5 people said the same thing yet you picked out me lmao Cause you're the only one i didn't understand. i'm just bringing out a point to clearify it in the subpoint. |
|
Last Edit: 7 years 5 months ago by BananaSlanger.
Login or register to post a reply.
|
BananaSlanger wrote:
Svanzscape wrote:
BananaSlanger wrote:
Svanzscape wrote:
BananaSlanger wrote:
![]() This is already in place. Rule 2.2 is covering that warnings must be issued within chat. Rule 2.2b, a subpoint, goes into specifics that detectives can issue commands/warning because of their role, and because its a sub point, its clear that the warning must be a written one. What the hell. You even read anything i said? As users gets warned by staff for not writing in chat. Even though it doesn't specify in chat which would be hard for new users/users to understand I read plenty from that. I also read each of your replies, and because your reply to my minussp was retarded, I'm assuming you didnt read what I said. Let me dumb it down for you. 2.2 is a point. 2.2B is a subpoint FALLING UNDER 2.2. They are directly connected. Is that better? PS, I love how like 5 people said the same thing yet you picked out me lmao Cause you're the only one i didn't understand. i'm just bringing out a point to clearify it in the subpoint. There is 0 need. That's why it's a sub-point. If you just keep repeating yourself it would add redundancy, furthermore adding to the already big ass list of rules, which isn't needed. If you're over the age of, minimum, 13, because that's the age you need to be when using steam, you should tell that already. New users don't get confused because the rules are unclear. New users get confused because the rules are too long and no one reads them. You'd add to the problem. |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
Svanzscape wrote:
BananaSlanger wrote:
Svanzscape wrote:
BananaSlanger wrote:
Svanzscape wrote:
BananaSlanger wrote:
![]() This is already in place. Rule 2.2 is covering that warnings must be issued within chat. Rule 2.2b, a subpoint, goes into specifics that detectives can issue commands/warning because of their role, and because its a sub point, its clear that the warning must be a written one. What the hell. You even read anything i said? As users gets warned by staff for not writing in chat. Even though it doesn't specify in chat which would be hard for new users/users to understand I read plenty from that. I also read each of your replies, and because your reply to my minussp was retarded, I'm assuming you didnt read what I said. Let me dumb it down for you. 2.2 is a point. 2.2B is a subpoint FALLING UNDER 2.2. They are directly connected. Is that better? PS, I love how like 5 people said the same thing yet you picked out me lmao Cause you're the only one i didn't understand. i'm just bringing out a point to clearify it in the subpoint. There is 0 need. That's why it's a sub-point. If you just keep repeating yourself it would add redundancy, furthermore adding to the already big ass list of rules, which isn't needed. If you're over the age of, minimum, 13, because that's the age you need to be when using steam, you should tell that already. New users don't get confused because the rules are unclear. New users get confused because the rules are too long and no one reads them. You'd add to the problem. Do you ever stop arguing. Cause your arguementions don't need to start but you still do. I made this post for a reason, if you can't respect it and just going to argue about it, forums ain't the place. Neither is TS. Now don't respond to this please. It'll just cause more drama. |
|
Last Edit: 7 years 5 months ago by BananaSlanger.
Login or register to post a reply.
|
BananaSlanger wrote:
Svanzscape wrote:
Pretty sure you're the one causing drama here. He criticises you, you respond innapropriately so he calls you out for that, so you respond innapropriately again and he calls you out again and then you realise that you're wrong but to save your face you pull the victim card and say he's the one arguing even though you're the one with the weak responses.BananaSlanger wrote:
Svanzscape wrote:
BananaSlanger wrote:
Svanzscape wrote:
BananaSlanger wrote:
![]() This is already in place. Rule 2.2 is covering that warnings must be issued within chat. Rule 2.2b, a subpoint, goes into specifics that detectives can issue commands/warning because of their role, and because its a sub point, its clear that the warning must be a written one. What the hell. You even read anything i said? As users gets warned by staff for not writing in chat. Even though it doesn't specify in chat which would be hard for new users/users to understand I read plenty from that. I also read each of your replies, and because your reply to my minussp was retarded, I'm assuming you didnt read what I said. Let me dumb it down for you. 2.2 is a point. 2.2B is a subpoint FALLING UNDER 2.2. They are directly connected. Is that better? PS, I love how like 5 people said the same thing yet you picked out me lmao Cause you're the only one i didn't understand. i'm just bringing out a point to clearify it in the subpoint. There is 0 need. That's why it's a sub-point. If you just keep repeating yourself it would add redundancy, furthermore adding to the already big ass list of rules, which isn't needed. If you're over the age of, minimum, 13, because that's the age you need to be when using steam, you should tell that already. New users don't get confused because the rules are unclear. New users get confused because the rules are too long and no one reads them. You'd add to the problem. Do you ever stop arguing. Cause your arguementions don't need to start but you still do. I made this post for a reason, if you can't respect it and just going to argue about it, forums ain't the place. Neither is TS. Now don't respond to this please. It'll just cause more drama. If you want to stop an argument then don't respond, especially if your response literally only mentions that you want to stop the argument you're literally causing yourself with that fucking response. Simple. |
|
Last Edit: 7 years 5 months ago by Raeker.
Login or register to post a reply.
|
You created a suggestion and everyone is having a healthy discussion. If you do not respect a healthy discussion, don't start one.
|
|
Login or register to post a reply.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker
|
|