TOPIC: [TTT Moderator] ImRock's Application

Steam Name: TheRockettek
Profile Link: steamcommunity.com/id/TheRockettek/
SteamID: STEAM_0:1:116093944

Game Tracker URL:
- The only TTT server there is
www.gametracker.com/player/Rock/play.zarpgaming.com:27017/
[Migrated to ImRock recently] www.gametracker.com/player/ImRock/play.zarpgaming.com:

Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario:
RDM can be interpreted as damaging another player without any purpose or true intent that can qualify as beneficial towards the game play.
This can include scenarios such as them being angry after being killed in a previous round.

Give three examples of an acceptable KOS and its scenario:
One of the most used acceptable KOSes is simply seeing someone being killed (HOWEVER could be your fault if they were shooting each other and the person hadnt had time to Identify the body), however if this was the case you would not be an acceptable KOS due to the fact they were both under fire from each other and you cannot confirm who is the traitor if they have not identified the body of the person yet however if they do not it would be acceptable to KOS them.

Another example would be usually not responding to KOS Called (which are used near the end of the round to gather who are still alive), it would be suitable to KOS such people as they would be attempting to stay hidden from the detective or innocents incase they are caught.

One more example of a suitable KOS would be that a user is not conforming to a detectives instructions such as not going to test, this can be KOSable as the user is attempting to not be testing incase they will be caught for being a Traitor. If the user ignored the Detective and was an innocent it would not be classified as RDM as the innocent would of been T baiting due to the fact that they are disobeying the Detectives that are in charge.

Give two examples of unacceptable KOS and their scenarios:
An unacceptable KOS in this case would be killing someone who had just been shown as a Traitor on the tester, this is not suitable due to the fact that traitors canrig the tester to show traitor and can also simply be resolved by retesting the person.

A similar non KOS would be that if a user was near a recent scene however had identified the bodies (unless they have direct DNA or the person who died did put a KOS
on them before they died), this cannot be KOSable as they have not done anything that would prove they are a traitor and instead could of just put suspicion on
them which cannot be KOSable.

Why I should be chosen (we recommend around 100 words):
I believe i should be chosen as a moderator as i believe i am quite active and i really dislike when people spoil the game. Sometimes when i am on there are
sometimes no staff on what so ever and at first it is fun as we just joke arround and such however later on it becomes pretty annoying due to the fact lower
roles such as the Rookies start to decide that because no staff are on they are free to do RDM and such which only spoils the game. I believe i should be staff
as i want to make sure the game is fair and that to ensure as many people stay on the servers.
ps:(Also can we get a discord server its much more productive than a teamspeak one)

Fixed your BBCode

Also,

T Baiting is not what you described it to be. T Baiting is when a user is shooting near a player to provoke them to fight back to see whether or not they are a T.

If you think about it there are multiple ways T baiting can be percieved tho. Generally you could just concider it as doing something as an innocent that a traitor would do to attempt to make another fellow innocent think you are a traitor, which could be including such a scenario as you provided such as shooting near however its effect is them attempting to shoot back or like i said, not going to the tester which the effect is the detective believe they are not innocent

T baiting is literally to provoke an attack to find out if the user is a traitor - hence the word "bait". A user ignoring a Detectives orders is merely just performing a traitorous act. There is no other perception.

Lots of effort has being put into your application.Your activity is a bit jumpy as it goes up then down only 1 recent punishment so far. Attitude in game i think is okay i will watch your attitude for next few days to see. Anddd yea this will be a yes from me seeing as you actually put much more effort into your application unlike others have done. May of being one thing wrong with your application however I've seen staff who got accepted who have now made quite a few mistakes.So for this

CrankyBot wrote: This is actually wrong. T baiting is basically pretending to be a traitor. It's also because of the T baiting rule why commiting traitorous acts isn't allowed.

ImRock is actually correct in this.

Raeker wrote:
Just gonna slide the blame onto the word Bait because bait and pretend ARE TWO DIFFERENT FUCKING WORDS FUCK THE DICTIONARY

CrankyBot wrote:
Dont worry you are not the only one who didnt get that rule to the extent. I have had multiple arguments with multiple other staff members about this issue. Maybe the rules should be clarified a bit...


Also for the rock dude



More stable activity would be preferable but you will be great addition to staff imo

LonelyDodo wrote: Cranky isn't wrong either as shooting at some one to find out if they're a traitor or not is considered T-Baiting it simple isn't the ONLY way of T-Baiting , it's made quite clear in the rules that shooting is just an example.

Good luck!

Nick0GR wrote:
Guys relax. It's another grey area in TTT, much like the other dozen.

Different staff usually deal with things differently, I personally don't think anyone is wrong here, yet I take Raekers side the most from his standpoint.

There are TONS of grey areas like this, not only in the rules but in the gamemode itself, being a good staff member requires to know the gamemode FULLY to be able to deal with most situations with appropriate justice and judgement.

Some clarification is needed when it comes to rules.. But that is not important for this thread...
Anyways, reading your application I notice that you have put some genuine effort in creating it. This leaves me with a good feeling, since that shows that you are serious about taking the role. Activity is sufficient, and your attitude is great..

Yes you are capable enough for the role

Good Apply, Good activity.

Fun dude on the server, knows rules, is easily capable to be staff member.

Good activity and a good application. As long as you keep recent punishments low then

noice very friendly in game

EDIT: been ARDMing false kosing at times and therefore has changed my vote

Not a big fan of your inconsistent activity, never really seen you on, I'd ought to see how you are in game more. But, from what I'm hearing from other staff members is that you were breaking rules and is not what i want from a moderator, due to this I will have to if i see improvement then i may change my mind.

Seems like a pretty good app, and good activity. Based on what I can see, you would make a good staff member. If you have no punishments ingame, then you will have my vote. Good luck!

TheXnator wrote:

lad