TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] [DM Owner][VIP]Samo's Application

[SSRP Moderator] [DM Owner][VIP]Samo's Application

RP Name: [DM Owner][VIP]Samo
Link to Steam Profile: steamcommunity.com/id/samandgaming

SteamID: STEAM_0:1:59133099
Current Gametracker Profiles
Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/player/%5BSam%5DClar...arpgaming.com:27015/
Server 2 - www.gametracker.com/player/%5BSam%5DClar...arpgaming.com:27025/

Age: 19
Estimated Server Time: 600 Hours
Languages I speak: English

Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario.
Random Death Match is one of the most basic yet important rule to understand as it can make players potentially loose millions and create heated mass RDM's within groups. When someone 'RDM's' they are killing a player without correct cause. The valid causes vary from situation but has to be a role-play reason specified in the rules.

Example Scenario
There is a gun dealer in the streets walking along, he walks to up a citizen and randomly shoots the citizen. This would be a completely random reason for his actions hence the name ' Random Death Match'.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario.
The New Life Rule or NLR as commonly referred to is when a player returns to the area or district (Tunnels separate the districts) they died in within the 3 minutes after dying. This is made simple with a big red countdown in the top center of your screen. There are also some other aspects to the NLR rule these are, you can not remember or discus what happened after you die, you are effectively a new person and should not go back for things like 'revenge kills'. This is why it is called the 'New Life Rule'.

Example scenario
There was a mugging that took place with player 1 as the mugger and player 2 who is the one getting mugged. Player 1 did /me drop 4k or die in 5 seconds! Player 2 did not co-operate and end up getting himself shot, player 2 ran straight back to where he got shot and started shooting at player 1. This player is then breaking the rule '2.2 New Life Rule'.

Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario.
Metagaming is when a player uses the OOC chat 'Out Of Character' chat to discuss 'In Character, (Role Playing)' information within this chat. This rule applies the same way if someone was to talk about 'Out Of Character' information 'In Character, (Role Playing)' chat.

Example Scenario
A player types in chat '/ooc Guys i'm raiding there base now! Come meet me!' this would be breaking the rule '2.3 Metagaming'.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.

How I would Handle It:
I would firstly TP player x to a suitable location for example a roof top, i would then ask him what happened to him, after hearing his story i would TP player y to me and ask him for his side of the story and why he killed player x. Is player x gave a suitable counter argument that would explain why he killed him, i would ask player x if he had any proof of player RDMing him. If i was given sufficient evidence that proved to me he did RDM player x i would then warn player y for RDM. If he did not give me evidence i would explain how a simple screenshot can be very effective in these situations and next time if he could get some evidence it would help. I would then kindly ask player y if he did RDM player x please do not do it again and if you need to read the rules type !rules in chat.

There are many possible out comes for this situation as you can sometimes find out that the player did RDM because of what he told you, but this is the most basic way i could handle a RDM without causing too much tension between the two.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.

How I would Handle It:
I would TP both player x and player y to a suitable location, for example an empty roof top. I would then ask player y why did you break NLR? Now half the time the player was not aware of the rule and I explain to them the rule and warn him for breaking the rule. The other way it goes is the player says i didn't and gives their side of the story, most the time with NLR the logs is enough evidence to warn the player y. Lets say for this instance it is not, i would ask player x for any evidence now depending on if player x would give me reliable evidence or not would depend on if player y got warned. If he did not have evidence i would explain the rules to him and suggest he reads them through at !rules.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided

How I would Handle It:
I would type in /ooc my macro bound message that reads, '/ooc Please do not Metagame. If you are unsure of this rule please type !rules.' , after that i also PM the player and explain to him what it is and why he broke that rule and also give him a verbal warning. For example, 'Hello (player x) you just broke the rule 'Metagaming' are you aware of that rule mate?' and If he apologizes and gives me a valid reason why he did it, for example 'I did not mean to use OOC I meant to type /gang' i would say 'Ok mate Ill just give you a verbal warning, don't do it again, thanks'. On the other hand if he was to reply with 'I don't know what that is' I would explain to him the rule and give him a verbal warning. If the player does it again I will TP him away and explain what he has done and depending on the situation possibly warn him or not.

Why I should be chosen (we recommend around 150 words).

I think I should be chosen for moderator because I was previously moderator and due to some personal reasons I had to stop gaming for a while and had to quit. Once I was able to play again I returned to Zarp and have been playing ever since, I still love the server and with my years of playing I have plenty of experience with dealing with players and all the rules. I would also like moderator because for the past 3-4 days I have been on 10 hours + a day and keep seeing rule breakers at night. I would love to be able to help everyone out and stop these players from ruining other people’s experience at Zarp. When I was staff previously I used to love doing F1’s and helping people and did many throughout my time and would love to join you guys again.

nice application and gametime is great (may have misread a few things as on my phone.)



Good Luck

x

Activity is pretty bad

Ok Macca thanks for the feedback, but like i said i didn't stop playing by choice it was a serious reason therefor no reason for me not to play like i did again and are already:)

Very immature in game.

+1 Support Good player, Always active, Never breaks the rules

Hello Samo I have reviewed your SSRP application, and taken activity and general knowledge into consideration and how you would handle situations given to you; I have now evaluated my decision and here are some things you will need to take into consideration:

- I do too agree with ToeRag, your activity could be so much better. We do recommend 2 weeks of constant activity if possible. So we can get a good feel of yourself within F1's and your activity so we can bank on you coming onto SRRP servers.

I finally conclude and I have given you:
Neutral (Not sure how to do it )

ThatsKarma wrote:

Weren't you and two members of your crew given warnings just 2 days ago for RDM after walking around the server as a group killing people... sorry if I'm wrong but I'm pretty confident it was you seeing as an admin was spectating me when it was going on.

@ Saaarh, no it was not i have no had a warning in around 1 year 2 months that hasn't been proven incorrect.

officernoodles wrote: He used to be a SSRP moderator, probably hasn't changed it yet.

If you read the application you can see that i had personal reasons why i could not play. I only have just been able to start gaming again due to a medical condition i would rather not discuss since i started i have been on it 10 hours a day that why my activity is 10 hours every day for this week. And yes i was moderator before my medical issue that was the last time i played hence the 'Zarp, moderator'.

Pros:Very Friendly,Very Knowledgeable. When hes was mod he was very fair in f1s, Very Mature
Cons Hes only been back for week but he show signs of staying

Pros:
Plays all day and night
Was a beast moderator
Fair and always doing F1's
Generous and refunds me when i loose things
Cons:
Left us for a while but has a good reason
+Support

DM Samo wrote:
I've just seen your warning was removed as there wasn't enough evidence to support it but I was the person who done the F1 and got you the original warning, it's a shame I don't record my games or it wouldn't have been removed.

Aidan|DaleAGaming wrote: Who are you? Have never seen you in game before. Actually i think i did and said 'Hey mate, never seen you before, how are you?' and you ran off.

DM Samo wrote: Brother Aidan
That will knock the memory

For me its a:


Reasons:
- Good Gametime
- Good Explanations
- Very good Application

Statement:
Your Application is one of the best i have seen so far. You explain very good and have a good gametime. I would increase the gametime tho. I havent checked the recent warnings yet, will do this later at home. But until that, its a +Support