Trying to avoid commenting but cant...
LZ Ace wrote:
So... where to start.
When a player (innocent) see other player (Innocent/Traitor) shooting at other person (innocent/traitor) and kills the person who saw shooting first.
As Tom pointed out, the 'first shooter' could be an Innocent chasing a Traitor after he has gathered enough evidence against him.
3) When a player (Innocent/Detective) uses a golden dealge to shot other player (innocent/traitor).
What does this even mean? Who do you call kos on and why would you intervene? If the player that gets shot at is the Traitor he will die on-hit, if he is an Innocent the shooter will die. As I said, no need to intervene.
Also, you could put the acceptable KOS reasons and their scenario in one paragraph, no need to split them up in two different parts as it looks messy and isn't very handy to read.
I can be annoying, but forget that part
No, we can't "forget that part". As a staffmember you're supposed to represent Zarp and show yourself an example for the Users. Imagine everyone being 'annoying' like you, wouldn't be very fun to play on a server like that, would it?
if you are really avoiding to make RDM but, you have no other choise to kill the RDMers you can get karma banned
You basically just admitted that you're a rulebreaker in your application, good job.
Let me be clear: as I see it now you're not the right guy to become a staffmember. Fix your attitude and understanding of the rules and wait another month to prove that you've changed.
Let me see...
When a player (innocent) see other player (Innocent/Traitor) shooting at other person (innocent/traitor) and kills the person who saw shooting first.
There is lots of cases possible about it..
1: Player A (Traitor) is shooting at player B (Innocent) and player B doesnt react, that means, the only one shoothing is the player A (Traitor) so you can kill him. Obviously, if the player B doesnt react is because he is innocent, if was traitor and someone was shooting him there was no logic on he doesnt shot back...
2: Player A (Innocent) is shoothing at player B (innocent), on this case player A is obvious RDMing, so it is valid if someone kills Player A (Innocent) saving player B (Innocent to the death)
3: Player A (Innocent) is shoothing at player B (Traitor) and player B is shooting at player A, obviously one of them is a traitor, and if you see player B shooting first you can kill him with no problems, if the player A is shooting or you shot him or wait until one of them shots you, the one of them who shots you is the traitor.
4: Player A (Innocent/Traitor) are shooting at you/Player C (Innocent), you have reasons to shot him, if he is innocent then he is a RDMer, if he traitor, there is no problem and your proven.
Other thing...
3) When a player (Innocent/Detective) uses a golden dealge to shot other player (innocent/traitor).
What does this even mean? Who do you call kos on and why would you intervene? If the player that gets shot at is the Traitor he will die on-hit, if he is an Innocent the shooter will die. As I said, no need to intervene.
I randomly wrote that one... If player A (Detective/Innocent) shots a player B (Traitor) the player B dies. You cant rdm with a golden deagle. But if the player B doesnt dies but player A dies, then, player B is innocent at all and he is proven innocent, you cant call kos on him.
... also
I can be annoying, but forget that part
No, we can't "forget that part". As a staffmember you're supposed to represent Zarp and show yourself an example for the Users. Imagine everyone being 'annoying' like you, wouldn't be very fun to play on a server like that, would it?
I mean, i used the admin chat lots of times though..
if you are really avoiding to make RDM but, you have no other choise to kill the RDMers you can get karma banned
You basically just admitted that you're a rulebreaker in your application, good job.
I'm not meaning it like your thinking
Imagine this.
1: Player A (Innocent) is shooting at you (Innocent) trying to kill you, you can kill him and isnt rdm.
2: Player A (Innocent) is shooting at you (Traitor) without you have doing nothing of wrong or kill anyone or using any T weapon... just walking normally. If you kill him because he shot you first, attempt to RDM of player A. If he kills you with any reason, player A just RDMed you.
3: Player A (Innocent) shots player B (Innocent) and kills him, someone checks his body and player B is innocent (dead), you know who is player A and you kill him cuz he killed someone before... You check his body and appears to be innocent... In this case, Player A rdmed on Player B, RDM of player A, you had enought reasons to kill Player A... If someone RDM someone and you kill the RDMer, you dont made RDM.
And Tom...
tomvtv wrote:
Well, i'll attempt to bring this over in a calm mannered way.
You have 38 warnings and counting, you are immature and sorry but you are miles away from being staff material.
also, "you have no other choise to kill the RDMers" That is already breaking the rules.
1: I dont have any warning about 1 month
2: I'm immature only because i spammed "I'm traitor" on preparing? Before the round starts... And even when people told that i was kidding... You still shot me... And kill me... Even on the day before it, i made the same... They noticed it and nobody called kos on me and shot at me.. One of those rounds i was a traitor and nobody killed me due it...
3: So if someone RDMs you you can kill him? Wait... Attempts to RDM you, since if he RDMs you, you're already dead... And that was RDM... Anyway, if someone innocent kills a innocent and you kill the first person, he made RDM, you had reasons to kill him... So that isn't rule breaking...
How are those kos reasons? So if someone is shooting a traitor, you will shoot them?
Well, if one of them isnt shooting at all, then that person is innocent... Then the one shooting is Traitor...
And once i already saw one (innocent) shooting at other player (Innocent), before i saw the other one doing it i was afk, when i came back i saw the player B shooting at player A... Then after Player A dies i killed Player B... Surprise, both was innocent... Even if i didnt saw Player A shoting at player B cuz i was AFK and i explained it clearfully on the report answer, i get not forgived and warned... For the most of the surprises... Player A was a RDMers who was RDMing me and i get warned once because that one since, he was the first one who shot me and i had to kill him, he reported me, didnt forgived me, getting me unfairly warned and slayed... On the next map when i saw other one shoothing him and didnt saw the ohter one shoting first like i told before... I explained it... And i still get warned, then i rage quit and get banned when it wasn't my fault at all... I didnt had fault of being AFK and on the moment i saw someone killing other one and killed him... Yeah...
candyflosskitty wrote:
iaintgotnotype wrote:
If he hasnt got any recent warnings, I dont see anything wrong, he can enforce the rules.
you've literally joined he forums today meaning you may not have been around to see recent shenanigans proving immaturity, also contradicting something that a superadmin thinks, seeing as they help run the server, doesnt make sense.
Lets see, i never had the chances of talk much to you... And you never saw how i'm really am... Well, not to many haves the chance of get to know me like im really am... And i'm immature? Oh wait... If i was immature i wouldnt cry on sad thigns? I wouldn't help some people? I wouldn't suffer?!? I wouldn't make people happy and help then when i'm the one who needs it mostly of the times?
Like i told before, not lots of people haves the chance to really know me... I can trust on everyone, but, it isnt that easy to find out who i'm really... Only close people knows how i'm... thx Kitty for your comment ...
LineLiar wrote:
No.
No need to expand on that.
I was already expetacting it...
Visionz wrote:
Your attitude and how you play never has seen any correction whatsoever since your first application.
Just no, just stop.
I was already waiting for that one ... Yeah...