TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] meathead595's application

Hi there! Im meathead595 and i have played on SSRP servers for ages now and i have realized that there are alot of rules breakers. People make f1's and i think it would be really fun to answer them I hope that this gets accepted and i hope you enjoy reading!

RP Name
[M] [YOUTUBE] meathead595

Link to Steam Profile
steamcommunity.com/id/meathead595/

SteamID
STEAM_0:1:55940738

Current Gametracker Profiles


Age
13

Estimated Server Time
120 hours, even though it doesnt add up on gametracker, the old server 2 i had about 30 hours on because nobody was on it

Languages I speak
English.



Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario.
Random death match, also known as RDM, is when a player kills another player with out a valid RP reason to do so.
Example being :
Player X kills player Y (Valid reason)
Player Y makes an f1
While in the f1 player X gets mad and kills player Y
player X is then warned for rdm.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario.
New life rule, also known as NLR, is when a player either...
1) player X kills player Y after player Y kills him, this is known as revenge rdm/nlr but i fought this should be in the section.
2) player X is being raided and gets killed, player Y then goes in and starts destroying his money printers, player X then returns under the NLR timer of 3 minutes and kills player Y.

Example being :
Player X is being raided, he has tons of money printers which he does not want to lose, but he dies by player Y shooting him, player X, not wanting to lose his money printers, runs back to his base and kills player Y and then continues to base.


Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario.
Metagaming is using OOC to say in character things. OOC stands for out of character so by saying stuff in character, you are breaking the rules. This includes, saying:
Player X wrote: Player Y wrote:
This is why the PM system was implemented, to give people information without metagaming and without having to be near them.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.

First i would talk to Player Y and ask for what happened on his side of the story.
Lets say he was in a car and Player X killed him while in it.
Then i would bring Player X and talk to him and ask what happened on his side of the story.
There are two things which could happen (There are more but these are the main ones)

Player X kills Player Y because Player Y ran over his gang members or friends in his car. So he got revenge for them and killed him. I would then give player X a verbal warning just saying that you should avoid killing people but not warn him.

Player X killed Player Y for his car, he then lock picks it and scraps it, if he did not admit to it and he lied then i would ask for any evidence player Y might have of him lock picking it, if player Y doesn't have any evidence i would say that there is nothing i can do, but if he does then i would warn player X for rdm and carjacking. But i would only warn him once for the two things.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.
I would first ask for Player X's story.
I would then bring Player Y and ask for his story.
If in the logs it said that Player Y did break nlr, i would warn him.
If it didnt then i would ask for proof.
If Player X had proof then i would warn,
If he didnt and it said nothing in the logs i would go on to the next topic which is,
was it rdm.
If Player X said it wasnt i would do /back to both of the players.
If Player X said it was, i would once again ask for both sides of the story.
I would then ask for proof from player X.
If the proof was correct then i would warn Player Y for rdm.
If it wasnt i would say sorry to player Y incase his base was raided.
I would then say that it is a good idea to have your camera out, just incase it was rdm.
If not i would say bye to player X and do /back Player X

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided

First i would tp to Player X so that the bank raid wasnt over because if you leave vault it ends.
I would then freeze him so he couldnt help.
Then i would say how that is against the rules.
I would then give him a verbal warning and if i see anything like that from him again, i would warn him.

Why I should be chosen (we recommend around 150 words).
I think i should be chosen because i know the rules well, even though i was warned by johnny for rdm, but that was because he was in an f1 inside of my base and i didnt realize so i killed him I also have a warning for CDM i think by nexie but that was because i had insane lag, and the other warn behind that wasnt meant to be mine. The illegal base one was a mod giving the warning to the wrong person. Proof in the spoiler.

Anyway, i know the rules well and i love SSRP, so much that is spend most of my time on it. I also think that i should be chosen because i can handle situations pretty well, and i am not too mean so if Player Y said sorry to Player X then i would ask if Player X forgave him, and if he did i would just give a verbal warn. Also i am known by alot of admins, examples being wheatley and exro. I have a pretty good popularity with most of the zarp community on SSRP and if someone is saying a question in OOC about rules i normally do awnser it for them And i also think i should get accepted because i am normally on when other admins/mods are not on so i can do the f1's which other admins cant do (example in the morning).

PS: I am going away in a week for 10 days so sorry for the inconvenience. Also i probley wont be able to attend most meetings because of my timezone. Sorry about that. But today i went around asking mods and ex admins like scottie and stuff asking if they have to attend meetings and they dont have to but it is fought to be good, so at most i might just be able to pop in at the end of one.
334 words in the last part.
1449 words in all of it (excluding this bit)

In the end i really do hope this gets accepted, this took me about 2.5 hours to make, so this is me signing out,
Thanks for reading!
-meathead595-

Whoah that was alot harder than i fought


EDIT : I am really sorry about them 2 warns but behind them i didnt get a warn for a week, sorry zarp.

Are looking at what everyone else has said, I have to go with

This might change back to +Support

jedijack81 wrote:
Thank you

-Support

Here is my opinion
Is a minge
Rulebreaks
Not mod material
Imature

Wolfjie wrote: Wolfjie why D:
Its fine, everyone has their opinion.

I'm not a staff so i made my opinion from the app. Don't know if he's broken rules before or things like that.

jedijack81 wrote: On the bottom it says i have 2 recent ones, but the other 1 before that wasnt supposed to be for me.

Oh ok so now I know.

Brother Aidan wrote:
Yeah i kinda dropped my mic and im saving up so i can get a proper blue yeti microphone with a stand and all of the stuff

Brother Aidan wrote:
Did you make an alt to avoid your ban sir?

imature
rulebreaker
not friendly
alot of self promotion
-support

xSeppe wrote: Meh, well i guess i am. But when i need to be i am mature.xSeppe wrote: Well not really, except from them 2 i guess.xSeppe wrote: I am but i guess everyone has there opinions.xSeppe wrote: the action of promoting or publicizing oneself or one's activities, especially in a forceful way.
^the dictionary meaning of self promotion^
Um, no offence, when did i do that?

Thanks for the input though

Guys anyone who was redirected here in OOC sorry.
A guy was asking about camping a base.
I was trying to copy and paste the rule but it was the link.
soz.
I will post chat in a sec in spoiler.
5.2 Finish - You should leave the base as soon as possible when you have finished raiding.
Guys i am so sorry i should of checked.

- SUPPORT

brofilroyal0 wrote: Reason?

brofilroyal0 wrote: Do you have a reason for - Supporting him

Anyways to the application

Positives
Game Time Is ok
Friendly (When playing with that I'm aware of he is never nasty to me)
Application looks good

Negatives
Everyone is saying that you have a recent warn.

Overall Verdict.
+Support

iJetzy wrote:
Thanks Jetzy!

+support
cos hes a good guy and he knows the rules

sonotpro2000 wrote: Thanks sonotpro2000! The support is really appreciated!

I'll post my opinion once I find you in-game and see your warnings.