Your activity is alright, I would like to see you improve on it by Sunday, but if you do so then It wouldn't be an issue. One recent punishment isn't ideal, but it's not the end of the world.
My concern is your application. It lacks detail and in some parts is confusing. For example, under an unacceptable KOS:
An12854 wrote:
-Player 6 killing Player 2 even after Player 3 verified him as Innocent.
This is a bit shaky for me, as even if player 2 is a confirmed innocent, I can still kill him if he does certain things. For example, if he starts shooting me, I don't care if he is proven or not, he is going to die. In this case, me killing him would be an acceptable KOS, even though he was proven.
Also your example of RDM: I wouldn't say that it is RDM. (cba quoting)
"
Player 1 shooting
Player 2 when
Player 2 shoots
Player 3 since he was proven as Innocent."
I don't really know what's meant by this, but to me you mean a detective has seem someone fighting against a confirmed innocent, and has then killed that person. To me, this isn't RDM, as joining a gunfight is when you have no proof of which person is the traitor. In this case the detective has proof that one person is 100% innocent, therefore he can kill the other one. It's like if the detective saw another detective and someone else fighting, he could kos the other person.