TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] Thomas Shelby's Application

RP Name: | Thomas Shelby |
Time Zone: GMT UK
Link to Steam Profile: steamcommunity.com/id/Jammi2k/
SteamID: STEAM_0:1:53115398
Current Gametracker Profiles:
Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/player/%E2%99%95Jamm...arpgaming.com:27015/
Server 2 - www.gametracker.com/player/%E2%99%95Jamm...arpgaming.com:27025/
Server 3 - www.gametracker.com/player/♕Jammi/usa.zarpgaming.com:27015/

Estimated Server Time: Probably over 7k hours

Languages I speak: English

Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario:

Player "Nafe" goes up to player "GamerFunHouse" who is in the mines minding his own business mining afk over night to get money. Player "Nafe" decides it'd be funny to shoot an afk miner even though he has no valid reason because "GamerFunHouse" has had no interaction with this player.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario:

I'm raiding a nuke as cop, I kill everyone because i'm insaneee, player "Nafe" gets mad and asoon as he respawns (no tac) he heads right back to warehouse where the nuke is placed within the 3 min period time and starts shooting cops.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.

I would simiply ask for both sides of the story to see if they match. For example if player "Nafe" accuses player "Clarky" for rdm saying he was afk and randomly shot by player "Clarky" and had done nothing to him since he killed him (player clarky wasn't revived therefore he has no reason). After listening to Nafes side of the story i'd then proceed to listen to what Clarky would have to say, if both stories didn't match up, i'd ask for proof and if Nafe isn't able to provide solid evidence such as video evidence showing clarky rdmed him then i'd end the sit as there is nothing I can do due to two stories telling me two different things.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time

Well i'd simply start of the sit by asking if Player "Nafe" has any proof, however I'd check the console to see which district the player had been killing Nafe in and take into consideration that the player may have been going back to nlr. However the player may of had tacs into that district so I can not use logs as valid proof. If player "clarky" (one being accused of nlr) denies of breaking nlr and having a tac down in that district and he was going back to kill Nafe meaning that he didn't break NLR due to having a tac down in the district he died in. However if Nafe says "No he didn't have a tac down in the district he's lying" and clarky objects to his statement, i'd ask for video evidence proving that he was coming back from spawn each time. and if push came to shove where I can not make a final judgement, i'd contact a CM to ask if Clarky had actually had a tac down and if I found out he didn't and lied, I'd ask an admin to give him an offline warning if he wasn't still on the server at the end of the investigation.

Why I should be chosen(we recommend around 150 words): I personally feel like I should be choosen because I have had many years of experience within SSRP which has given me a very good understanding of the rules which will allow to me help users to the best of my ability. I also feel like I should be chosen because i'm ex staff (admin back in 2014) and i'd make a good fit into the staff team because when I was staff I was professional with the role I was given and made sure each user was treated with same respect and treat fairly in situations. I am also very active with in all servers at the moment (apart from server 2) meaning I'd be on s1 and s3 a lot maintaining the server and making sure it doesn't go to shit. The colour orange also looks hot af on me.

The color orange also looks so fucking hot on him so you may as well just give it to him so you can increase his already massive sex appeal

Nafe wrote:
The ladies love a man in orange

Vicente Carrillo Fuentes wrote:

Really friendly and helpful person, deserves to be a staff member
+Support init lad

so so so so bitc h get the sdo yes111!

Dramn wrote:
wdym! you're my bitchh, bitch

Decent activity and judging by the support you've received so far I'm assuming you're a friendly enough and approachable person. Your past experience will come in handy, albeit it's been a long time since you were staff.

Best of luck!

You deserve this

Good luck my brother
You got my

paid clarky to get accepted

Why were you being racist and extremely toxic towards me a couple weeks ago out of nowhere when I hadnt even spoke to you?

Nikoo wrote: a couple weeks ago is the key information here

hes evidently demonstrated changed based on what other have said and as such its not really a consideration

SorIe wrote: In addition to this, if he was punished for that, the punishment would've expired considering it was a couple of weeks ago.

Nikoo wrote:
Tbh i'd like to see some kind of evidence to see what you're on about before you start slandering me and pretty sure you've been staff since I returned so how come you I haven't had any punishment or even a punishment request from you for doing that if you cared? Anyways clarky even told me to get my act together or I'll end up banned so that's what i'm now doing

reformed man

Dr. Richard wrote:
Please may you state what you're reasoning to you saying neutral is? so ik what I can improve on