TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] Dramn's Application

RP Name:
Dramn

Time Zone:
CST (Central Standard Time)

Link to Steam Profile:
steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198296784246/

SteamID:
STEAM_0:0:168259259

Current Gametracker Profiles:
Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/player/Dramn/darkrp.zarpgaming.com:27015/

Server 2 - www.gametracker.com/player/Dramn/darkrp.zarpgaming.com:27025/

Server 3 - www.gametracker.com/player/Dramn/usa.zarpgaming.com:27015/

Estimated Server Time:
Server 1 - About 283 hours in total! (Last Application was wrong)

Server 2 - About 154 hours in total!

Server 3 - About 347 hours in total!

So all together, around 784 hours across ZARP SSRP Servers.

Languages I speak:
English.

Dark RP Related Thingies!
(These are reposts, so please don't hurt me.)

Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario:
Random Death Match or RDM is when a player kills another player without a proper in-game RP reason, such as Self Defense, Raiding, Etc. An invalid reason to kill some one is if you simply don't like them.

In this scenario, we have two players: Let's call them Tom and Bob.

Bob is upset at Tom because Tom called Bob a "big dum", so Bob brutally murders Tom for no other reason, this would be RDM as there is no RP reason (according to the current set of rules) to kill Tom.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario:
NLR // New Life Rule is when you are killed in any District // Area // Tunnel, causing you to have to wait a certain amount of time (as displayed at the top of your screen) before you may return to the area at which you died.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.

1. Accept the F1 and TP to player X.
2. Request to bring player X to a roof, and learn about the situation.
3. Because it is only an accusation and I did not see, I require proof that it happened. If there is proof, I cannot warn player Y.
4. If there is proof, TP to player Y and tell him/her that I need them for a sit.
5. Explain the situation and if the rulebreak calls for it, decide whether or not to give a verbal warning or a real warning.
6. End the sit and close the F1, returning both players to their last known positions before they were TP'd


Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.

1. Accept the F1 and TP to player X.
2. Request to bring player X to a roof, and learn about the situation.
3. Go to player Y and tell them I need them for a sit, TPing them afterwards.
4. Whoever died first, probably broke NLR. If it was in the same district and player Y had died first and returned and killed player X before the time had run out, then it was indeed NLR.

Why I should be chosen(we recommend around 150 words):

I know I should be chosen due to my dedication to bringing a safe, understanding and inclusive environment when it comes to handling situations that a Staff Member of SSRP would be confronted with handling. I do my absolute best to understand all sides of each situation and to remain calm and friendly while doing so! I am patient with people and have had a lot of time on ZARP SSRP as a staff member as well, spending most of the hours that were posted above as a staff member.

The servers require more staff members who are willing to put down their own RP and playtime as RP Jobs to instead become a Staff job to moderate the servers. (We already have quite a few awesome staff members working constantly and I would like to compliment those staff members by making their jobs easier.)

Thank you for considering my application, again and I wish you (the reader) a fine day.

If there is anything you believe I should improve upon in my application please tell me right away!

Good luck!

Keep your activity up

YES YES!

really nice person + ex staff and really good activity!

Yes, of course, always...

Yes, thank you kind sirs.

I personally think that the way you would handle an f1 would disregard the majority of f1s. Even if they do not have proof, the majority of players will admit what they did, and if the sides disagree, it is then that you need to ask for proof.

best staff member

Good activity, friendly, creepy. All the attributes of a great staff member.

Kyber wrote:
I would disregard other F1's? If some one RDM's some one else and admits that they RDM'd them, then what's the problem? ;p

I want to use what you said to help improve my Application but I'm confused. ;L


EDIT: Thank you for your feedback regardless! <3

Yes

Dramn wrote: I don't know if I'm interpreting this wrong, but when you write:To me, this makes me think that you simply just won't follow up the situation if you are not given any proof (as you used the word "if" which suggested that you will not follow it up as it is you requiring a condition to be met to require player Y for a sit). And I think that it will simply disregard quite a lot of rule breaks, as from experience, not many people will go through the effort to provide proof. Also the fact that a lot of people either admit to their wrongdoing, or slip up on lying in their story.

Ah okay, when I was staff usually I would ask for proof first and if they didn't have it, I would explain to them that it would be difficult to warn them without proof and then I would ask if they would like to continue with the sit. Most of them say yes, some of them say no. If they were to say yes, I do know how to continue with the sit. ;p But thank you for your concern ^>^

Yes.

Lucky_ wrote:

THANK, YOU, PERSONS.

Really nice guy and very active!

_HazemShady_ wrote:

Helped me raid bank and did not want any sort of payment.

Kinda got gjugg and gluoned rushed on 1 min left but whatever.

HI! =^<^=

GUD ADMONG