TOPIC: [TTT Moderator] MattorS's Application

Steam Name: MattorS
Link to Steam Profile: steamcommunity.com/id/X_Mattors_X/
SteamID: STEAM_0:0:177633343

Link to GameTracker for the server:
Server 1: www.gametracker.com/player/MattorS/play.zarpgaming.com:27017/

Languages I speak: Fluent English, a bit of French


Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario:

Random Death Match (RDM), is when a player (either Innocent or Detective) kills another player without sufficient reason for killing said player. For example, if Player X (Innocent) kills an AFK player, that would be classed as RDM. Also if Player X was to kill a player for no reason, ie the player hasn't fired a bullet or done anything suspicious, that would also be RDM.

Give three examples of an acceptable KOS and its scenario:

1. KOSing a player for killing an innocent without reason. If Player X was to witness Player Y kill another player and when the body was ID'd the other player was innocent, then Player X would be permitted to call a KOS on Player Y.

2. KOSing a player for not id'ing bodies. If Player X sees Player Y next to one or more un-id'd bodies and Player Y doesn't proceed to ID them, then Player X can call a KOS on Player Y.

3. KOSing a player for damaging you in any way. If Player Y damages Player X in any way - crowbar, ak-47 ect - Player X is - permitted to call a KOS on Player Y.


Give two examples of unacceptable KOS and their scenarios:

1. KOSing a player based on their player model. Player Y (Traitor) kills Player X (Innocent) whilst disguised. Player Z (Innocent) witnessing the killing and sees that Player Y has a Kylo Ren player model but doesn't get a name. Player Z then proceeds to place a KOS on anyone with a Kylo Ren player model.

2. KOSing a player on suspicion. If there are multiple shots with an ak fired at the tester, then Player X (Innocent) see Player Y (Innocent) walks out of the tester with an AK, and then proceeds to kill him. As Player X did not witness any killing, Player X is not permitted to KOS player Y.


Why I should be chosen (we recommend around 100 words):

I feel that I should be chosen to become a moderator because, well, first of all, I have read the rules multiple times over and have a good understanding of what is allowed and what is not. I will be able to provide a positive experience for all the players that require help or assistance in any way.

Also, I feel that at its current point, the server has too much RDM, and I want help fix the problem and give the server's player a better overall experience. Sometimes all admins and mods are offline and the server becomes chaos, I want to make sure I will be on so I can keep the server calm and allow everyone to have a good time.

I sincerely thank you for taking the time to read my application and I hope to hear back from you soon.

Your activity is very good but only for 4 days , we recommend a full 2 weeks consistent activity and if you play every day by the time of the meeting (Sunday 7 GMT +- 0) you will only have about a week. Your application covers all that is needed and you have no recent warnings (as of last time i checked). Keep up a good and friendly attitude , a consistent activity and no recent punishments and you will have my vote! Good luck!

Nick0GR wrote:
UTC +0 you uneducated swine.

CrankyBot wrote:

Nick0GR wrote:
UTC +0.

CrankyBot wrote: What he's saying, Nick, is that there's only a single GMT timezone. So either say UTC+0 (the international correct term) or say GMT without the +0 part.

Raeker wrote:
For once Raeker doesn't correct me.

CrankyBot wrote: There's no point in correcting you if you're not around

well you are really good in game although you have 4 days i see you trying not to break rules
so it is a from me

I see u are and were active. You are playing good, knows rules, my vote is for yes.

Your activity so far is decent but not 2 weeks however your knowledge of the rules is quite high and you only have 1 recent punishment in this point in time. I have seen you in game and you act with a sense of professionalism which is good. So for now i stay

I remember your name and thats either good or a bad thing. Cant check your rap sheet but with 1 recent and that activity ill be for now I will check you out when I get back home

Lord Voldemort wrote:

Just needs more consistent activity

The only thing holding you back is your activity. Best of luck <3

If we exclude your punishments for impersonation which i think were kinda harsh you only have one recent punishment which is for RDM, which can be overlooked as it is only one recent. Your activity needs to be improved, as you have only played for 5 days in the last 2 weeks (we recommend 2 weeks of consistent activity). Application is good however one thing to note is that RDM is not limited to innocents and detective, traitors can RDM as well if they kill another traitor for no reason. As your activity needs to be improved you will not have my vote this week, apply again next week when you have more activity.

Miia wrote:
I think its rude to rate a punishment by the story given by 1 person :'( (who was involved)

- He impersonated cool cat and got kicked for it
- He then rejoins as something like "Rad Puppy" or something which is cool
- Then someone changes their name to MattorS
- He then asks in admin chat if it would be impersonating if he changes his name back to MattorS and I answer that it would be and then we discuss few minutes over different circumstances on how this can be exploited.
- He then disregards everything we talked about and changes his name to MattorS impersonating 2nd time in 20-30 mins after being told that he would be punished. He fucked up and got salty about it.

I do not think this was harsh

and yeah I have talked with Nickolas already

Sorry dodo i made a mistake, i didn't mean kinda harsh what i meant to say was complete bullshit. There is no rule saying that users are not allowed to impersonate other users.

Example scenario, 2 users join at the same time with the exact same name (something normal like steve), what do you do? Yes it can be confusing as there are 2 steves in the game but it would not be right to force one of them to change their name, as why should they have to change their name when joining a server? It does not break any other rules so its fine.

Miia wrote:
There is no rule regarding staff impersonation either and yet everyone acts up on it. In the end there are thousands of situations that go into the grey area of the rules and imo I did the right thing. handling it like the name was offensive is how I chose to proceed. Ask to change -> Kick -> warn + kick. He did it with complete intention of having the exactly same name as the other guy

and yeah we discussed about this with MattorS and I wouldn't be sure how to handle that scenario. I would probably ask both if they could change their name to something unique, but it wasn't like this situation where it was obvious he chose intentionally someones name after being informed that he would be punished for it. You are allowed to have your opinion and I respect that, but I do think what I did was right action in the given situation. Had he not started impersonating others in the first place this all would have been avoided.

LonelyDodo wrote: Keep all comments on topic and don't start an argument please!