TOPIC: [SSRP] Staff Report - AndrewMcb

If you weren't trolling a staff member who was trying to deal with a situation and equipping your ice king to hinder his ability to do so, this wouldn't have happened. Andrew was within his rights to slay you here, it was incredibly harsh, but the slay itself was not invalid. If Andrew himself feels like this was too harsh, he is of course able to refund you the Ice King, which he has offered to do but you've declined to accept it, so that one's on you.

Regarding teleporting people out of RP without checking, that's something that Andrew should be checking on before doing, but is something which can be resolved by a simple reminder and/or retraining from a member of the Lead Team, but I'll leave that to Pie to deal with as he is handling this!

EDIT: I just rewatched the video and the one who tp'd you wasn't even Andrew!

TheXnator wrote:
why sam tp him in the dessert area when is not allowed to be there ? that a thing you need to argument with iphone ( sam )

Sam Winchester wrote: you're literally interrupting someone's sit, if it's poorly handled then it must've been because of you

Clarky wrote: i guess if sam didn't teleport him into this area he shouldn't be slayed by andrew so it's sam false

L

sinzz wrote: no shit

Theres no rules in atmin area therefor no rdm can be committed therefor this slay is false

JoshuaIsGreat wrote: False. Andrew just simply rdm'ed him

TheXnator wrote:
I know it wasnt him tping me, it was a joke because I knew sam was gonna tp me. As for the "trolling a situation" it was a coinflip not an admin sit. When you say I refused a refund I refused 37 irid pickaxes in replacement for it... From my understanding the arena has different rp rules on top of that would you say what he did falls within the ethos? Let alone it being to make me lose my ice king but a slay for ardm? You like to push the ethos in every situation but why isn't it used here? From what I am seeing you use previous punishments to determine the next punishment, tell me when he took the time to check my recents before slaying? All these ethos seem relevant to this situation. You said he was incredibly harsh, is that not against ethos? Stunning a staff member for 3 seconds is equal to losing an expensive item I got through xmas boosters. Surely you can't be serious. If that is the case and thats how it works no one use a fucking suit ever for the chance you ardm and have it slayed and the actions defended because its "within ethos"

Ethos wrote:

Clarky wrote:
Was a coinflip not an admin sit. He was trying to coinflip as mod on duty and someone said he can't rp as that job so he switched job and went to admin arena

EviIstewie wrote: oh i swear there's a rule against that lol

Clarky wrote: and also as a staff member to tp a player into a area who are not allowed to be here ? exept if there is a good reason

sinzz wrote:
You're talking to the entire staff team by saying that sort of shit mate I always see random players with admins etc in there gangs and there buddies fucking around.

Sam Winchester wrote: they had a good reason or they want to chill a little but you it was for a bad attention which was to harm them

and how what i said is crap i call was your attention to get it tp ?. No i guess

orbadoc wrote: Is the secret room in the spawn considered a place to do roleplay actions like cf or etc just to know

sinzz wrote:
As long as you don't have to noclip or use commands to enter it then it's an RP area.

who the fuck is andrewmc

Gody wrote: A staff member

Nafe wrote:
I like this attempt to put a topaz printer