TOPIC: [SSRP] Staff Report - Jack Bushross

Staff Member(s) Name: Jack Bushross

Staff Member(s) SteamID: STEAM_0:1:58009824

What Did The Staff Member(s) do?: So basically, my alliance, Broccoli, had a RP House in the elevator base on s1.
They had 3 Shops Inside; Blue's (Pea Shooters), dont kill me pls' and someone else.
Jamie then Tped to dont kill me pls and checked if he was afk.
He was afk and instantly removed the Ownership of the doors, removed all the shops out of the RP House and removed the RP House sign.
But the thing is, Blue was still active and no one checked if he was afk.

My point is; for exampleif you have a nexus base on s3 with 50 people and the door owner is afk you can just remove all their printers and claim the doors?

I know, propably someone else should do this request, but i dont feel like all the other people really cared about it but i actually do.

What Server(s) Was This On?: SSRP S1

Evidence:





Anyone feel free to handle, i just want this sorted out and a proper reason why the doors got removed.

thats messed up

How can you remove someones door when he is roleplaying with his shop checkout????

The shop owner job rules literally say that you have to use a shop location is possible

I’m still yet to understand why the people involved never make the report

OnionRings wrote:
The answer is pretty obvious, most of the people who do end up making these reports are people that aren't necessarily fond of the person they are reporting in the first place.

That being said, I think we should be careful not to dismiss these reports for that reason alone since they can still be valid.

I teleported the owner of the base, He wasn't using the base and was afk for a extreme amount of time. This is nothing like having a "ele base" as your stated in ooc. The other person who was shop owner wasn't actively using the "base" along with this I kindly enough moved the shop outside of the the past PR house. Next time you should have an active player owning the doors.

jack bushrsos wrote:
I mean, hes using it actively by having a shop in it?

Damn you guys are getting petty

DEADMONSTOR wrote:
Say that again and the will report u for harassment

Wrecking wrote: No he had a shop inside afk, I moved the shop outside and left it there. You can just count it as much as "abusing alts to gain an rp advantage"

DEADMONSTOR wrote: it is , but it still fucks up someones gameplay so yeah . do something!

jack bushrsos wrote: you cant just assume who is afk and who isnt

TheFierceOwl wrote:
Yeah, don't say he is AFK when he clearly isn't playing the game because he was asked!

jack bushrsos wrote: Blue isnt a alt, and by not being in the base, it doesnt mean hes not using it anymore

jack bushrsos wrote: I put my shop there and went to spawn since someone wanted to buy some guns(he didn't buy them he just gave me a mummy ) from me since I'm a heavy gun dealer and for the other person that owned the base I can't comment on their behalf

Shop Owner
Raid/Mug: No.
Print: Yes.
- You need a shop/checkout. Do this before basing.
- You should use a shop location if possible.

Wrecking wrote:
That's passive usage. If someone owns a gunshop or something of that sort and go AFK for an extended amount of time I think it's fair to remove the ownership of the doors and move the shop outside of the house.

Someone who is willing to use the base actively through printing, nuking or something along those lines should be prioritized over an AFK person who just happened to have a Shop entity inside the base.

If you need me to elaborate on the differences between passive and active usage of a base, feel free to contact me on Steam. Although, I think you should understand.

Rick Johnson wrote:
im still talking about blue, being active on the server and still getting kicked out of the base, im not talking about the base owner

The forums are way too red these days and it’s making kijg me very upset