TOPIC: I'm out

GregoryTWIX wrote:
We just stopped because there isn't really anyone else playing lol.

Sorry m8.

Brusk_Macaroon wrote:
Eehhh, isn't that quite irresponsible? In my opinion you should've atleast take the time to tell me on my profile, as my comment section is always open. And even if you didn't feel like doing that, you could've atleast told someone to tell me. Sorry, but this just looks like a very irresponsible reason to me.

late reply cuz i didnt read comments

「LightArrows.exe」 wrote:
That's your own fault, no one else.

Dcxbigdaddy wrote:
How's it my fault if he decided not to atleast tell someone else to tell me...? I was completely unaware of that till now.

Because you removed everyone.

「LightArrows.exe」 wrote: I shouldnt go throught that hassle when you deleted me. Plus its irresponsible for you to not be active on the server you should be active on. So don't put this on me.

Its common sense to think that being inactive on a server will lead to a demotion as there are other players that are willing to be more active/becoming staff.

I recommend locking this as this will probably lead to controversial things. We said goodbyes, now carry on.

Dcxbigdaddy wrote:


From the way Brusk said that, it seems I was demoted some time ago. Even so, I still have people on my friendlist.

PS: I'm not 100% sure if Blocked left before this post or not.

EDIT: If only it notified you if someone posted while you were posting.
Brusk_Macaroon wrote:
It's as simple as asking "Hey, can someone quickly tell Light he's been demoted?" during the meeting.
I_am_the_Walrus wrote:
How many staff were still staff on different servers for ages after being inactive? I'd also like to add that they could've atleast warned me for my inactivity and tell me to be more active.
I_am_the_Walrus wrote:
If staff think that the things that are being said is gonna be controversial, they are free to lock it. I, however, strongly disagree with them locking something simply on suspicion that that could happen. After all, we all know when enough has been said, I believe.

You removed all the Head admins that would know about your demotion, that is your fault.

Dcxbigdaddy wrote:
And it's that hard to ask a moderator to relay the information? And if only Head Admins would know about my demotion, wouldn't that defeat the entire purpose of the fair voting during meetings, where not only Head Admins, but also other staff vote?

「LightArrows.exe」 wrote:

Dcxbigdaddy wrote:
Professionalism at it's finest!

「LightArrows.exe」 wrote: You do realize that demotions only go on during the lead team right... AKA headadmins an Me, the only Superadmin during the time, where there

Brusk_Macaroon wrote:
Even so, don't you think it's rather unprofessional to not let a moderator relay information? As I've said before, it's as simple as typing a sentence, which you are doing plenty of here aswell.

As for DCX's response, I atleast expected professional responses like I've been trying to give here.

「LightArrows.exe」 wrote: I dont think Its unproffesional at all. You dont go to the meetings, you dont have contact with any SA or HA, or you dont go on the server, you get demoted without reminders.

Brusk_Macaroon wrote:
If you think that way, I'm fine with that. Whatever floats your boat. However, right now you're acting as if it's the only way, completely dismissing the way I'd like to see it. If you were inactive, you would atleast like a warning before getting demoted, wouldn't you?

LightArrows you are acting like a kid. if you want to talk about it feel free to come on the teamspeak.