Huperchild wrote:
Lyra wrote:
Huperchild wrote:
Lyra wrote:
Huperchild wrote:
Lyra wrote:
Markus Chellwigg wrote:
Lyra wrote:
DG Noah wrote:
When the fuck did this become about afk players
For the record, AFK Players use auto clickers, Meaning they auto respawn l1bt@rd
So for the record. If i get killed in spawn, respawn because of habbit and then go AFK and do something else, i'm not AFK? Being AFK doesn't mean you're an "AFK Player" it's just means you're AFK.
You werent afk when you started breaking NLR though were you?
Yeah, but the point wasn't that i was AFK. The point was that codabro's logic is flawed
what part of it is flawed lmao
all i said is u need to leave spawn if u have nlr in it, and thats what you should do
So AFK people who have NLR should leave?
If die in spawn and I respawn due to habbit, I have to leave spawn before I have to do something in real life?
I'm talking about this case and not in general? You weren't AFK, you were actively breaking nlr.
And they were actively harrassing me, you were actively harrassing me and you weren't banned. If we want to talk about double standards, you should also be banned for harrassment like tinky and Na1.
I think there's a difference between constantly saying "Kill yourself retard end your life retard" and killing you a couple of times. LITERALLY nothing to do with double standards. The punishments were proportional to the rulebreaks
Yes, and you continued to harrass me after the first report. You tried your hardest to get them denied and said yourself that you knew that they wouldn't accepted. You got your friends to fill my reports with minus supports, if that even did anything
Also this WHOLE post is about double standards, if it's not then the point of this post is pointless.
The issue of me NLRing in the clips affected nobody and didn't harm anyones RP experience or experience on the server, it didn't benifit me to NLR. The point of the NLR rule is to stop people from just respawing and RDMing people because they killed them.