Na1 wrote:
FluffyOP wrote:
Sam the Sausage wrote:
FluffyOP wrote:
P1: Trump is a populist
P2: Trump is an idiot
P3: Trump is xenophobic
P4: Trump is racist
P5: Trump is right-wing
P6: Trump is incompetent
P7: Trump is corrupt
P8: Trump is a protectionist
P9: Trump is anti lgbt
1 example per proposition in the sake of brevity
I will not be making a case for why the proposition is bad; just an example of the proposition.
E1: His rhetoric consisted of draining the swamp and blaming all of the failures of government on the elites.
E2: There is not a single video anyone can find, where he is speaking on a subject with more than a 4th graders understanding.
E3: Trumps naming of COVID-19 as the "chinese virus"
E4: Muslim travel ban(maybe more bigoted than racist)
Trumps unfounded scepticism of Obamas birthplace.
Saying a judge born in america who happens to be mexican can not make a fair ruling with anything related to him.
E5: Propositional value statement, not going to convince people why being right-wing is bad.
E6: The one positive thing about Trump is, he is incompetent, he can not get anything pushed through the senate or the house and he has held senate MAJORITY for
his entire term. He didn't repeal obamacare, he didn't build the wall, he pushed through a milk toast tax exemption for the wealthy...
E7: His impeachment proved futher the corruption of his cabinet and party, refusal for accepting witnessess, Ukraine dealings were also deemed plain corruption, but got denied because of the republican senate majority.
E8: He is been rolling back his tarrifs slowly, which is good, however the amount of tarrifs he enacted is bad, bringing back companies from overseas, is economical suicide, there is a reason why some things are made abroad, protectionism is just a bad economic theory, no serious enconomist is a protectionist.
E9: His twitter ramblings of a transgender military ban are the highest level of proof of his anti-lgbt rheotric
Reading this, I can see you do not obtain your facts from trusted sources. I'd suggest reading up on material from both sides and forming an opinion based off that. I can't even begin to dig into the misinformation you have just provided as there's too much of it.
Best regards,
Sam
50/50 you are trolling, but i will bite. i know you said "you cant even begin to dig into the misinformation", but humor me please, name a single thing that i do not have the full picture on or misrepresented.
The fact you say "Chinese virus" is racist which isn't as it comes from from CHINA, using your logic the Spanish flu was racist also?
you are literally stepping into the ring of debate with a level one argument, that falls flat on its head by the time you reach the word "racist". i never called using it racist, i called it xenophobic, since its effect its had has harbored xenophobia among people.
how can you be so incapable of assessing the climate around the usage of "chinese virus" compared to "the spanish flu".
the spanish flu happend during the fucking 1918 dawg, information didnt evenf fucking travel during that time, terms like racism and xenophobia had not even been seen before.
if a spanish flu happend right now and trump called it the "spanish virus" and it affected people in a real way, YES i would call xenophobic.