TOPIC: [TS3] Sorle's Ban Dispute

Sorle wrote:
I'm pretty sure I've seen you on their forums before just laughing about getting away with Mass RDM on ZARP. This comment too just made your ban look that much more well deserved.

Morgan wrote:
Agreed. You shouldn't really say that as staff can just punish you.

Morgan wrote: I spoke about it with Para, told him it was a joke, and he checked logs and confirmed it. Sorry but the ban is clearly excessive and you're just holding your grudge against me without using any valid reasoning.

Also, when was that comment? A month ago? You're STILL holding that against me? jesus christ dude you're taking this grudge to the next level

I'll talk with doom, and post a reply

uhh wrote:
Yes I did read it fully I was just stating what rules you broke in a joke way since I knew you was joking

Anon_Gaming wrote: I implore you to do some further thinking than what he tells you, because I guarantee if you simply go based off what he said, this will be denied, as he seems to think excessive bans are okay for some reason. Also, I forgot the fact that he was strongly targeting me on Teamspeak that night.

uhh wrote:
I've got a fair few of questions to get answered, because if your end is fully true, and you got a ban straight up for posting it, then Ethos was broken.

I will find out his end as well, and find out what happened

Anon_Gaming wrote: I doubt this means anything, but if it does, Smo was in the channel when it happened. He saw that I just got instantly banned for it without a proper chance to explain myself after he moved me in.

Morgan wrote: What does this have to do with anything? So people are now allowed to be banned excessively (if what Sorle says is true, obviously) just because you don't agree with some of the things he says?

Seems more like you're holding a grudge for no reason to me.

Raeker wrote:
It is showing that Sorle has a very bad attitude and reputation in the community as a whole, which would justify a slightly longer ban (a one day ban would be enough normally, maybe a 2 day ban in this case) since Sorle doesn't tend to learn from past actions.

TheXnator wrote: And you're blatantly ignoring two things here:
A) It was a joke which was proven to be just a joke by ParaMontana.
B ) IT WAS A MONTH AGO.

So both you and Morgan can get your shitty grudges off my thread. I don't care what you think, someone with a superior rank to you on Teamspeak has already stated that it's a break of ethos.

TheXnator wrote:
He was not banned for his attitude, he was banned for advertising another server, so none of that has ANY relevance to the ban, it is also from the PAST the shit he had posted there, which is not needed to be brought up, it would be the same if we used Morgans CM ban against him, at this given time.

I will look in to it and find out the rest once doom is online.

uhh wrote:
I'm not saying that I agree with Morgan, I'm just saying that what Morgan said (if true) could have some kind of impact on the decisions made when banning you.
If it was a month ago though, then no, Morgan shouldn't bring it up.

Ban "Dispute", wonder where that's from? lol

Shows how self conscious zarp is knowing that they are going downhill and are scared that people will realize that other places are better so the hide the truth and get rid of anyone who could help show the truth

Its almost like North Korea of gmod ayyyyy lmao

Tangspastic wrote:
People who say this always stick around despite saying they're leaving though

Grand Wizowd wrote: uhhhhhhhhhh please dont expose me

uhh wrote:

Tangspastic wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

anyways 5 days is way too long

Grand Wizowd wrote:
Its easy to trigger people here ayyyyyy lmao