Login to ZARP
|
|
Aidan|DaleAGaming wrote:
Nade Jones wrote:
ExroOATS wrote:
I'm sorry. Let us record 24/7 and all the 70 players who are on the server... Sorry an admin doesn't need proof to justify a ban ![]() I know, I hate that reason Exro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() But he claimed he used his brain. I think it was scientifically proven that it's impossible to count to 100 because of how long the letters are. If you really want to go with that argument we'd have a lot more rulebreakers. Its clear to staff when someone has obviously broken a rule (with a few exceptions) players can always appeal. When the staff member speaks to the member of staff that banned the player they may mention that there was no video/screenshot proof favouring more in your direction. To be honest, this would make nearly all situations over a thousand times easier, this is why TTT is the best though. |
|
Ex-Deathrun Moderator Ex-SSRP Administrator Ex-TTT Moderator Ex-Minigames Moderator "Perp advertiser"
Last Edit: 9 years 1 month ago by Sonzy.
The topic has been locked.
|
itzsonzy wrote:
Aidan|DaleAGaming wrote:
It would. But it would be extremely boring for staff and we wouldn't be able to help anyone Nade Jones wrote:
ExroOATS wrote:
I'm sorry. Let us record 24/7 and all the 70 players who are on the server...Sorry an admin doesn't need proof to justify a ban ![]() I know, I hate that reason Exro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() But he claimed he used his brain. I think it was scientifically proven that it's impossible to count to 100 because of how long the letters are. If you really want to go with that argument we'd have a lot more rulebreakers. Its clear to staff when someone has obviously broken a rule (with a few exceptions) players can always appeal. When the staff member speaks to the member of staff that banned the player they may mention that there was no video/screenshot proof favouring more in your direction. To be honest, this would make nearly all situations over a thousand times easier, this is why TTT is the best though. |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
Aidan|DaleAGaming wrote:
itzsonzy wrote:
Aidan|DaleAGaming wrote:
It would. But it would be extremely boring for staff and we wouldn't be able to help anyoneNade Jones wrote:
ExroOATS wrote:
I'm sorry. Let us record 24/7 and all the 70 players who are on the server...Sorry an admin doesn't need proof to justify a ban ![]() I know, I hate that reason Exro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() But he claimed he used his brain. I think it was scientifically proven that it's impossible to count to 100 because of how long the letters are. If you really want to go with that argument we'd have a lot more rulebreakers. Its clear to staff when someone has obviously broken a rule (with a few exceptions) players can always appeal. When the staff member speaks to the member of staff that banned the player they may mention that there was no video/screenshot proof favouring more in your direction. To be honest, this would make nearly all situations over a thousand times easier, this is why TTT is the best though. Not true, it would simply mean that all players have means to back up their words and the admin will get the full situation of what happened, from to perspectives. The issue with this is the videos can easily be edited. |
|
Ex-Deathrun Moderator Ex-SSRP Administrator Ex-TTT Moderator Ex-Minigames Moderator "Perp advertiser"
The topic has been locked.
|
itzsonzy wrote:
Aidan|DaleAGaming wrote:
And how do you propose all the staff record all the online players and helping players... itzsonzy wrote:
Aidan|DaleAGaming wrote:
It would. But it would be extremely boring for staff and we wouldn't be able to help anyoneNade Jones wrote:
ExroOATS wrote:
I'm sorry. Let us record 24/7 and all the 70 players who are on the server...Sorry an admin doesn't need proof to justify a ban ![]() I know, I hate that reason Exro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() But he claimed he used his brain. I think it was scientifically proven that it's impossible to count to 100 because of how long the letters are. If you really want to go with that argument we'd have a lot more rulebreakers. Its clear to staff when someone has obviously broken a rule (with a few exceptions) players can always appeal. When the staff member speaks to the member of staff that banned the player they may mention that there was no video/screenshot proof favouring more in your direction. To be honest, this would make nearly all situations over a thousand times easier, this is why TTT is the best though. Not true, it would simply mean that all players have means to back up their words and the admin will get the full situation of what happened, from to perspectives. The issue with this is the videos can easily be edited. |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
Aidan, just to reiterate, he was on an ALT account, with no access to the logs, therefore he couldn't check the times. His timings would be inaccurate. Therefore, it's literally a word for word.
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
Nade Jones wrote:
Aidan, just to reiterate, he was on an ALT account, with no access to the logs, therefore he couldn't check the times. His timings would be inaccurate. Therefore, it's literally a word for word. This, right here, is honestly unacceptable.If you're staff, you need to make sure you're right before taking action. |
|
ex-dog LT member on many servers
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: deleted#1111
|
I spoke with Cyber and we both decided to Deny this Appeal we think you should wait out your Time.
Denied
Locked
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
|