TOPIC: Hacking Policy should be changed

The thing is if only the higher rank staff could be more active than the moderators or admins

hacking doesn’t exist

Yes, Nafe this "TO allow people to leak our anti-cheat from just a couple weeks minimum activity would be foolish." I fully understand that Admins shouldn't get access to anti-cheat.
But I'm suggesting that Admins can ban these cheaters, not 50/50 chances.

Wrong

i agree. people who dont go outside have enough game time to know when someone is hacking. people who are super admin- are not stupid surely and can see if someone is blatantly hacking

Hi Darka,

The change you have proposed where admins can punish people simply because they believe that what they are doing is "proof" of cheating is never going to happen.

The reason for this is because as soon as you allow that, people are going to each individually have their own definitions or ideas of what counts as "conclusive" proof. This is why we have the clauses outlined in the current hacking policy, where evidence like that must be voted on by the Lead Team to ensure that as many steps as possible have been taken to ensure that we can conclusively say that it is enough evidence. This isn't a matter of trust, but about personal perception of what counts as "hacking". Even as a Community Owner myself, I can't just punish someone for cheating because I think they are.

You can read over the full Hacking Policy here: zarpgaming.com/index.php/help/policies/75-hacking-policy

If you feel that higher up members of staff are not available often enough, then I would suggest applying for a promotion yourself if you feel that you could contribute: zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/server-applications