TOPIC: About zarpgaming hacking policy

So our hacking policy gives us the permission to ban a hacker only with anti cheat proof so we need at least a SA to be on everyday on every server 24 hours ...
Or the hacker could just hacks and run away and when people reports him on the fourm HE STILL ESCAPED AND NO ACTION HAVE BEEN TAKEN EXECPT WE TELL THEM BLABLA WE WILL KEEP AN EYE ON THEM BLABLA (bullshits) and thats never happend ... anyway ... i will leave the suggestion or recommendation about anti cheat tools or about our hacking policy
And i would like it to be posted here because i blive that no one visitd the suggestion section anymore so ... we should remove it because our owners dosent check any suggestions anymore
And if anyone disagree with me i would like from him to talk with me here

Yeah this is a problem.

One side I completely understand, an SA+ is needed to ban a hacker as admins can be baised and think someone may be hacking when they aren't.

But on the other hand the fact that blatant evidence is disregarded just because someone wasn't there to "scan" them seems like a joke.
I ca easily toggle hacks to raid a base and turn them off, nothing will happen.. nothing.

I believe the current policy is very bad and gives the impression that zarp is very cheater friendly. A user gave a video of a cheater full on spinbotting but he was not banned because there was no "anti cheat screenshot"

Basically what a user can do who wishes to cheat is to do it while no super adminis are online and the cheater would never be banned. I miss the times when video evidence of someone spinbotting or spectating someone aimlocking was enough proof to ban a user.

The current policy profits the cheaters more then the users

MyNameBrokeTOU wrote:

I still think Admins should not have anticheat, that is one thing we disagree on, but I do believe if very obvious reports on the forums like the recent spinbotting one on TTT should be allowed to be accepted even without an anticheat.

Im gonna be honest here, a long time ago I fought, and i fought hard with crystal clear evidence, only to get denied without having my evidence looked at.

this needs to change.
atm it seems to me like you want ur staff to quit, because that was my plan.
Increase in lead team members or change of ranks, maybe hacking policy. a rank inbetween admin and lead team?.

Dont forget how many chances you get if you get caught

Aspect wrote: True

Aspect wrote: First a warning, then a kick and thirdly a ban that can be appeald 2 weeks later

That video was clearly "Anti Aim", and somehow he got off in the clear.

Fake Down + Anti aim = No ban

You say you need super administrators yet do you ever try to contact them? Also head administrators can anti cheat so it's not just super administrators who can anti cheat. This is just my advice.

Assassin wrote:
thats how tyler gets away with his hacks

ParaMontana wrote: you are not taking this seriously

ParaMontana wrote: Says the idiot that got caught, you disappointed me getting caught.

Yes. And kick them for Hacking? If people are retarded enougth to hack, Then they deserve what they wanted by hacking. Which is a permanent ban. Apoligizing and stuff, Always get's them unbanned. But why? They obviustly just wanna get unbanned, Doesn't mean they'll stop. People still break rules after they came back from CM Ban and Perma ban for Hacking, But does it change? Not always. And that is a HUGE problem.

Tyler Durden wrote:
i should have listened to your advise back then. and not use bhops and just silent aim. sorry man

As someone who has hacked in the past I can say that It can take you about 20s to download and install hacks, there needs to be a better way to detect them.
If I truly wanted I could download hacks (Or just enable my Hack Vs. Hack ones) and raid a base no problem. It takes no effort to hack and we need a better way of stopping them.

_{I have no knowledge of anti cheat so if what I am saying is hard to add to ssrp then please say so.
Also This isn't a confession of hacking again on zarp, I won't waste my second chance.}

Again people come and complain while being misinformed. The hacking policy is there for a reason and that is to ensure fairness across the community when it comes to dealing with hackers. People are given two chances when they hack within the community, first a kick and then a ban, depending on the situation. This directly falls in-line with the communitys ethos and means that everyone gets fair treatment. People deserve seconds chances and deserve to have fun on the servers. However, the policy does need changing, which I believe is already being discussed. Finally admins will never receive the anticheat tools as it is too easily abused and not there place to have them.

CaptinF1rework wrote:
Fixed your grammar
I agree though.