Gody wrote:
Pitt wrote:
Of course they would get banned but it's the fact that people will attack others who say no. It happens, maybe not on a large scale but it does.
I understand where you're coming from Pitt, but the people that attack others should really not even be at ZARP, I'm not trying to sound mean or nasty, but it is only an opinion
I think you know all about that. Listen, the point is is that, it would be more of a hassle to see people attacking others because they voted yes/no, if the person who voted no wants you to know WHY they voted no, they will tell you. I REALLY do not see a point in knowing who voted yes/no.