TOPIC: [TTT] dingofetch - Staff Report

GeT_ReKt wrote:
You were banned for a reason. If you needed the logs you could have asked an admin and you do have quite a few of them in your friendlist

GeT_ReKt wrote: Alt accounts are strictly forbidden on the server, even if you just came on for that ban evading will result in a punishment.

LonelyDodo wrote:
yea but i didnt know that im new to the game with that stuff O.O
i mean it was 1 hour ban i would have closed it , just wanted to do the report and get evidence.

The problem I have is that you are giving absolutely no evidence and then just expecting people to believe you, it doesn’t work like that, we need evidence to support your claims or there is nothing we can do. From the logs provided all we can presume is that you did join the gunfight, unless you show clear footage of the guy running away. Considering you have 11 recent punishments, just saying we should believe you because you’ve applied for staff is a completely invalid argument.

LonelyDodo wrote:
and i dont have any of the admins/moderators on my friendslist where you came up with that

GeT_ReKt wrote: "cmon you saw my application and you know as i do that i memorized the rules", Did you miss the bit about alt accounts?

@Eddie wrote:
Ok so first report i did, didnt work cause you told me you need logs.
This time i get you logs now you want video?
i dont record my games or stream. So thats what happens to an honest man . Fine do as you wish im not going to even bother.

GeT_ReKt wrote:
you defiantly had me, whether you deleted me or not is your own business.

GeT_ReKt wrote: In what sense of mind would you expect using a second account to evade a ban would be allowed and not give any consequences?

Miia wrote:
I honestly didnt know. Just thought gonna handle reports so i need to know which is KOSable and which is not , didnt think about alternate accounts

GeT_ReKt wrote: You have given no evidence whatsoever, you’ve written logs down but that can be easily forged and is not evidence at all, it would have to be a screenshot of the logs. Anyway, the logs aren’t helpful in this situation

@Eddie wrote: Forgive me for saying this but that is complete bs. Why does he now need a video to remove a warn he should never have gotten because there was no video to prove that the guy didnt try to identify the body. If there was no evidence he should never have been warned and its bs that now he needs to have proof.

@Eddie wrote:
i said it to mattors that i opened the account to get the logs for evidence . i didnt know about it. i didnt even play i was AFK all rounds searching for the logs ( DMG KILL SHOT ...) and i didnt have anyone on my friends list

Mattors wrote:
I never added you to delete you

Miia wrote: Well I wasn’t talking about how the staff member dealt with it in game, I’m talking about how we can’t just appeal his punishments with no evidence. I agree that this wasn’t handled properly in game though, which could suggest his punishments should be removed

Miia wrote:
The issue here is that dingo's and Get_Rekts' stories do not match. In this case we take the staff members word. So unless GetRekt has proof to the contrary then the warn cannot be removed.

@Eddie wrote: I don't think we should presume anything. If Rekt says the guy was walking away, then I can only assume that he was - these matters can go quite fast sometimes. Don't forget that this is apparently the bottom floor of the lighthouse, where someone can easily leave the area in a manner of ways within but a second of playing.

From what I can tell, no proof of Get_Rekt being in the wrong here was ever provided other than people making assumptions. That is not how we staff - we've never staffed that way. And yeah, the way of staffing where we need proof causes issues sometimes - last summer there was a group of players that repeatedly accused other users of walking past unidentified bodies - but it is the fairest way to treat users and to prevent situations such as these from happening.

Raeker wrote: Fucking kiss me right now

Raeker wrote:
i wish i did my account before the 7th of may so i can vote for you
Finally someone who understands me ( you too mia )

Raeker wrote: I agree, I’ve made a mistake because when I first left that comment I was purely writing my opinion on his appeal, and not thinking about how he originally received the punishments. The only other thing I can come up with right now, seem as dingo has not left his response yet, is that dingo witnessed it happen and therefore decided he didn’t need the evidence