Kyber wrote:
Raeker wrote:
Kyber wrote:
Evidence:
Not needed
I mean it's there for a reason lol. Unless Eddie admits to this or an SA+ was online at the time and can confirm your story this will probably be denied.
What actually needs to be provided as proof though?
You're accusing Eddie of not dealing with the report properly, so maybe proof of that?
According to him he opened a chat. That you then decide to minge around is fine, but then don't accuse the staff member of not dealing with it properly when you're the one spamming chat and refusing to speak.
I've been seeing this more and more from you now. Your attitude is actually becoming disgusting. Sort it out, jesus.