TOPIC: [TTT] brandonhops2001's Ban Appeal

Name - brandonhops2001
STEAM-ID - I don't actually know how to find it.
Admins Name - Insanity
Reason - Too many recents
Server - TTT
Time - 48 hours
Story - I just had too many recents. But I didn't get banned until 12 hours later.
Proof - Not really.
Extra Information - I've read the comments already and I would like you to just stop ripping into Armani, the guy made a mistake ffs leave him alone please. We all make mistakes.

brandonhops2001 wrote:
Use the template:
Just for information, I have banned you because Armani didn't when he has given you your 7th punishment.

Insanity wrote: You banned him 12 hours after his last punishment, wtf? You have to punish him with a ban once he gets a punishment, not because of shit that has already been dealt with, who is training staff and telling them they could do this because this was definitely not allowed when I was staff and I’m fairly certain it still isnt

Armarni4 wrote: 12 hours later?

Armarni4 wrote: Shouldnt matter, he should have been punished by you originally, this is your fault buddy and he shouldnt have been punished 12 hours after, seems like poor training!

Armarni4 wrote: are you an idiot? how is banning someone 12 hours after they were punished your fault

Armarni4 wrote:
I minus sp'd one of your staff applications as did everyone else, you're not at all qualified to be staff on any server and this is a perfect example of it.

Kyber wrote:
7 recents = ban in pretty much all cases, why does it matter who bans him , most of the time the guy just forgot to ban him or he's a mod so he can't

Ezz wrote:
This. A ban worthy offense is a ban worthy offense regardless of when the ban comes. If I record someone cheating and make a forum post should we deny it because the ban will come after he has already cheated? Thank you.

mellow wrote: Well if someone got 10 recents a year ago and never got banned you wouldn't ban him now either. (Bit exaggerated but you get the point) if a player has too many recents but then manages to play 12 hours without getting any I don't see the purpose in banning him.

mellow wrote: No, you don’t understand. He was punished for him breaking the rules with a warning, if, at the time of the warning, the staff decided he should be banned then they should have done it then. If someone records someone cheating they haven’t been punished for that infringement and that’s why they can be banned

Kyber wrote:
Ye but the ban comes as a result from all the warnings he got , he's not given just a warning or a ban, he should be given both. he warned him and just he forgot to ban him so another admin did it later on, staff forget to check rapsheets all the time and in general if you see someone with too many recents you should ban them otherwise you'll have people walking around who should of been banned 2 or 3 recents ago.

Bruh Armani 1. I am very sorry for all this. 2. I have changed it I just do not know my steam ID. 3. Honestly I don't actually mind whatever you choose, honestly you should just choose to ignore the appeal because of the backlash.

Tom. wrote:
true but depends how much of those 12 hours hes been playing for , he probs should of checked his activity

Ezz wrote: I really do not understand how hard it is for TTT staff members to check rapsheets before giving punishments its been a constant issue for such a long time now. Just because TTT staff are too retarded to check when they are giving punishments does not mean staff should be going thru rapsheets checking them and then banning people out of the blue who at that moment in time have been following the rules.

brandonhops2001 wrote:
don't worry about it and you can just link your steam profile , they should be able to get it off that. we're discussing the ttt rules , its not backlash against you at all.

also use the template linked above otherwise this will probs be declined

Miia wrote:
how am i meant to brag about how many reports i got this week if i take time to check someones rapsheet ?

brandonhops2001 wrote:
This your SteamID my friend (STEAM_0:1:510968765)

Kyber wrote:
I mean the ban was perfectly valid since he had 7 recents in his rap sheet, to be fair it was bit harsh but he has been breaking rules 7 times over the last 2 weeks and therefore gotten banned.

y'all crying like it's a staff report and you're gonna get fully demoted and perma'd for not banning someone grow the fuck up