TOPIC: [SSRP] Stricter On Hacking

Chuteuk wrote:
Highly Zero Tolerance.

Grand Wizowd wrote:
Yup very strict less strict than ZARP though. As remember under their policy cheating bans are per account not per person so you are allowed to buy a new account and access the game immediately with no need to appeal or wait.

Grand Wizowd wrote:
Yup very strict less strict than ZARP though. As remember under their policy cheating bans are per account not per person so you are allowed to buy a new account and access the game immediately with no need to appeal or wait.

No words needed

Chuteuk wrote:

Ban on GTA = No access to the game
Ban on Zarp = Access to 10.000 Other Servers
Every time an account gets banned on GTA the company makes 60 dollars.

Not to mention that all bans on GTA happen automatically while on Zarp the Lead Team has to put alot of their time to catch someone.

Yeah but is there any actual reasoning for making it a kick first then a ban?

RealDenis wrote: Yes, a "Two strikes and you're out" system. When you get kicked you're made aware that hacking isn't allowed in any way shape or form on our servers. It's their chance to change their actions and turn off their hacks. Failure to do so results in a permaban on the servers.

Raeker wrote: That's just stupid, if you mass rdm and LTAP you don't get warned so that you know you aren't meant to do it, you get banned so why should it be different for something more severe like hacking?

AA RFLeX wrote: Isn't that an argument for ZARP's policy? What would you rather have, the current system or a system where you can "buy" your way back into the game?

Also, "Ban on Zarp = Access to 10.000 Other Servers" isn't exactly a valid argument either. We're assuming that the people that play on our servers play ZARP because they like it more than the other servers.

Chuteuk wrote:
On matchmaking definitely, if Valve were to hunt down every person who buys a new account after getting VAC Banned it would be a very tough situation for them, they have no ban evasion policy because of how huge the playerbase is and how hard it is to detect someone evading a ban, unlike GMod, or ZARP.

Let's take a different example, how about the 3rd party services for CS:GO, those that are considered more serious because they have better anti-cheat, better tickrate, so on.

ESEA:

• Cheating:

• Ban Evasion

FACEIT:

• Cheating:

• Ban Evasion

My point is, I believe that the only reason Valve has no policy against buying new accounts to evade a ban is that it would be a very, very tough job for them, unlike the ZARP servers.

Blocked wrote:
Good point but it's not true unfortunately. Valve already has this technology and routinely and easily links accounts to the same person in order to detect spam accounts, fraud, abuse and much more. It could easily be integrated to stop VAC banned players re-buying their game. But they don't do it because it would be absolutely ludicrous. Players do deserve another chance you know after all it is just a game.

VAC bans will be applied to all accounts sharing a phone number at the time of the infraction. Accounts that do not own the game the VAC ban is for will still receive a VAC ban and won't be able to purchase the game moving forward.

The phone number on the VAC banned account(s) will be suspended for three months and cannot be added to another account during this time. If the phone number is later added to an account that receives a VAC ban, the duration of its suspension will be extended.