TOPIC: A note to some staff

So as some know i haven't played on ssrp for a while but decided to jump in today and introduce my cousin to zarp and we had generally a great time, then someone rdmed him so i told him to make an f1 which he did. When it got responded
the admin asked for proof without brining the accused person and then refusing to bring him by saying that there is no proof and ending the sit

My point here is that when dealing with an f1 about RDM don't instantly ask for proof and then refuse to bring the accused person, but bring the accused rdmer first and ask him why he killed the person, it could happen the the players changes their story during the sit which proves the player to be lying on both sides or if the accused player describe what happened then it suitable to ask for proof that proves the defenders story wrong

example if player x claims he raided player y and player y took a screenshot of him dying outside in the open which would prove the rdm

zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/darkrp/57...mation-thread#255983

No drama is needed, just keep this in mind

The issue sometimes is that a lot of staff now focus on the quantity of F1s they do rather than the quality.
The quicker they can finish it, the quicker they can get to the next one and then brag about how many they done at the end of the week.

Saaaaarah wrote:
We keep an eye always on quality, when we have staff we're keeping an eye on them in the F1's and I see where you're coming from as a User however this is not the case.

That is fucking bad staffing, people who end the fucking F1 without listening to stories are fucking braindead, most of the time it turns out the guy unknowingly owns himself up to the rule break with a different intent.

I hate seeing this happen when I sometimes spectate staff :/

THIS is useful to some staff

Sally wrote: thank you

If there is an issue with people doing this, and you have names just message me some names, I can keep an eye on them.

Brandify wrote:
I've given many names to lead members before and no action was taken.

spooder buddy instead of making a post like this you should have contacted a higher ranked staff member that could handle the sit.. IMO

The Gamer Guy wrote:
I've never had any names passed to me, pass them to me, and if that is happening, I'll deal with it.

Clarky wrote: Same.
#BringBackOldStaffTeam


Also,This happened to me once.

Brandify wrote: Keith Cozart wrote: i talked to the staff member and he was a real nice guy but just made this post so maybe some staff can keep this in mind

Was this by any chance Emp?

Marco. wrote:
What? The staff team who unbans community banned members, yeah, no.

Brandify wrote: What? The staff team who are almost full of racists, yeah, no.

Disconnect: banned by Sam Townsend for permanent ().

I agree some of the staff really needs to read the Ethos

Bilbo Swaggins wrote:
Some Players need to get their shit together and stop being an ignorant racist.

Bilbo Swaggins wrote:
When you get back from a community ban people expect a change and improvement but instead you just decided to be racist to and rude. It's not acceptable at all and no one finds it funny.

You were told to stop and were obviously trying to cause issues.

This is normally what we expect from staff members and is normally what people are told in their training when first receiving staff. But I feel that this should always happen in a sit to ensure that there is still a chance for an RDMer to admit to what they have done.