Login to ZARP
|
|
sorIe wrote:
fuck yall bitches sadboys best gang |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
The following user(s) said Thank You: SorIe
|
Ashur. wrote:
TheXnator wrote:
Ashur. wrote:
go ahead, recode the entire gang system, because you were the ones that told us if you had to change the leaderboards to go off Upgrades and Loot instead of Loot you'd have to recode it completely TheXnator wrote:
Nick0GR wrote:
Sorry buddy, you're wrongDauntless best gang what are you on about? Etherious best gang Do I have to hard code my gang to the top of the leaderboards? ![]() ![]() ![]() table.sort( TABLE, function( a, b ) return a.loot > b.loot end ) :shrug: |
|
...
Login or register to post a reply.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Ashur
|
DEADMONSTOR wrote:
Ashur. wrote:
tell xnator that cause he said he'll have to recode it TheXnator wrote:
Ashur. wrote:
go ahead, recode the entire gang system, because you were the ones that told us if you had to change the leaderboards to go off Upgrades and Loot instead of Loot you'd have to recode it completely TheXnator wrote:
Nick0GR wrote:
Sorry buddy, you're wrongDauntless best gang what are you on about? Etherious best gang Do I have to hard code my gang to the top of the leaderboards? ![]() ![]() ![]() table.sort( TABLE, function( a, b ) return a.loot > b.loot end ) :shrug: |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Ashur. wrote:
DEADMONSTOR wrote:
Ashur. wrote:
tell xnator that cause he said he'll have to recode itTheXnator wrote:
Ashur. wrote:
go ahead, recode the entire gang system, because you were the ones that told us if you had to change the leaderboards to go off Upgrades and Loot instead of Loot you'd have to recode it completely TheXnator wrote:
Nick0GR wrote:
Sorry buddy, you're wrongDauntless best gang what are you on about? Etherious best gang Do I have to hard code my gang to the top of the leaderboards? ![]() ![]() ![]() table.sort( TABLE, function( a, b ) return a.loot > b.loot end ) :shrug: The code DEAD has given you is the code used. I did not say that I would have to recode it to go by upgrades rather than loot, I would just have to change the index it sorts by for that, but I am not going to make it sort by upgrades, but am rather plan to add another element to the gangs which will be the overall score of the gang, which will use an equation to base it on number of members, number of upgrades, level and amount of loot, and then it will order by that. |
|
Discord: thexnator Former Community Owner: 2020-2022
Login or register to post a reply.
|
TheXnator wrote:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Ashur. wrote:
DEADMONSTOR wrote:
Ashur. wrote:
tell xnator that cause he said he'll have to recode itTheXnator wrote:
Ashur. wrote:
go ahead, recode the entire gang system, because you were the ones that told us if you had to change the leaderboards to go off Upgrades and Loot instead of Loot you'd have to recode it completely TheXnator wrote:
Nick0GR wrote:
Sorry buddy, you're wrongDauntless best gang what are you on about? Etherious best gang Do I have to hard code my gang to the top of the leaderboards? ![]() ![]() ![]() table.sort( TABLE, function( a, b ) return a.loot > b.loot end ) :shrug: The code DEAD has given you is the code used. I did not say that I would have to recode it to go by upgrades rather than loot, I would just have to change the index it sorts by for that, but I am not going to make it sort by upgrades, but am rather plan to add another element to the gangs which will be the overall score of the gang, which will use an equation to base it on number of members, number of upgrades, level and amount of loot, and then it will order by that. Wouldnt this work table.sort( TABLE, function( a, b )
if a.level == b.level then
if a.upgrades == b.upgrades then
return a.loot > b.loot
else
return a.upgrades > b.upgrades
end
else
return a.level > b.level
end
end ) |
|
...
Login or register to post a reply.
|
DEADMONSTOR wrote:
TheXnator wrote:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Ashur. wrote:
DEADMONSTOR wrote:
Ashur. wrote:
tell xnator that cause he said he'll have to recode itTheXnator wrote:
Ashur. wrote:
go ahead, recode the entire gang system, because you were the ones that told us if you had to change the leaderboards to go off Upgrades and Loot instead of Loot you'd have to recode it completely TheXnator wrote:
Nick0GR wrote:
Sorry buddy, you're wrongDauntless best gang what are you on about? Etherious best gang Do I have to hard code my gang to the top of the leaderboards? ![]() ![]() ![]() table.sort( TABLE, function( a, b ) return a.loot > b.loot end ) :shrug: The code DEAD has given you is the code used. I did not say that I would have to recode it to go by upgrades rather than loot, I would just have to change the index it sorts by for that, but I am not going to make it sort by upgrades, but am rather plan to add another element to the gangs which will be the overall score of the gang, which will use an equation to base it on number of members, number of upgrades, level and amount of loot, and then it will order by that. Wouldnt this work table.sort( TABLE, function( a, b )
if a.level == b.level then
if a.upgrades == b.upgrades then
return a.loot > b.loot
else
return a.upgrades > b.upgrades
end
else
return a.level > b.level
end
end ) You're not meant to tell them that I can do it relatively easily smh |
|
Discord: thexnator Former Community Owner: 2020-2022
Login or register to post a reply.
|
TheXnator wrote:
DEADMONSTOR wrote:
that's it buddy, demoted. TheXnator wrote:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Ashur. wrote:
DEADMONSTOR wrote:
Ashur. wrote:
tell xnator that cause he said he'll have to recode itTheXnator wrote:
Ashur. wrote:
go ahead, recode the entire gang system, because you were the ones that told us if you had to change the leaderboards to go off Upgrades and Loot instead of Loot you'd have to recode it completely TheXnator wrote:
Nick0GR wrote:
Sorry buddy, you're wrongDauntless best gang what are you on about? Etherious best gang Do I have to hard code my gang to the top of the leaderboards? ![]() ![]() ![]() table.sort( TABLE, function( a, b ) return a.loot > b.loot end ) :shrug: The code DEAD has given you is the code used. I did not say that I would have to recode it to go by upgrades rather than loot, I would just have to change the index it sorts by for that, but I am not going to make it sort by upgrades, but am rather plan to add another element to the gangs which will be the overall score of the gang, which will use an equation to base it on number of members, number of upgrades, level and amount of loot, and then it will order by that. Wouldnt this work table.sort( TABLE, function( a, b )
if a.level == b.level then
if a.upgrades == b.upgrades then
return a.loot > b.loot
else
return a.upgrades > b.upgrades
end
else
return a.level > b.level
end
end ) You're not meant to tell them that I can do it relatively easily smh |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
TheXnator wrote:
DEADMONSTOR wrote:
TheXnator wrote:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Ashur. wrote:
DEADMONSTOR wrote:
Ashur. wrote:
tell xnator that cause he said he'll have to recode itTheXnator wrote:
Ashur. wrote:
go ahead, recode the entire gang system, because you were the ones that told us if you had to change the leaderboards to go off Upgrades and Loot instead of Loot you'd have to recode it completely TheXnator wrote:
Nick0GR wrote:
Sorry buddy, you're wrongDauntless best gang what are you on about? Etherious best gang Do I have to hard code my gang to the top of the leaderboards? ![]() ![]() ![]() table.sort( TABLE, function( a, b ) return a.loot > b.loot end ) :shrug: The code DEAD has given you is the code used. I did not say that I would have to recode it to go by upgrades rather than loot, I would just have to change the index it sorts by for that, but I am not going to make it sort by upgrades, but am rather plan to add another element to the gangs which will be the overall score of the gang, which will use an equation to base it on number of members, number of upgrades, level and amount of loot, and then it will order by that. Wouldnt this work table.sort( TABLE, function( a, b )
if a.level == b.level then
if a.upgrades == b.upgrades then
return a.loot > b.loot
else
return a.upgrades > b.upgrades
end
else
return a.level > b.level
end
end ) You're not meant to tell them that I can do it relatively easily smh Wut.... This doesn't make any sense lmao Why would you not just add it if it is easy instead tell people that it needed a complete recode when it obviously doesn't. Seems a bit fishy to me |
|
...
Login or register to post a reply.
|
TheXnator wrote:
DEADMONSTOR wrote:
Yeah dead you can't tell us it's easy cause then he can't blame his inactivity on the fact that he "is working hard on the updates" TheXnator wrote:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Ashur. wrote:
DEADMONSTOR wrote:
Ashur. wrote:
tell xnator that cause he said he'll have to recode itTheXnator wrote:
Ashur. wrote:
go ahead, recode the entire gang system, because you were the ones that told us if you had to change the leaderboards to go off Upgrades and Loot instead of Loot you'd have to recode it completely TheXnator wrote:
Nick0GR wrote:
Sorry buddy, you're wrongDauntless best gang what are you on about? Etherious best gang Do I have to hard code my gang to the top of the leaderboards? ![]() ![]() ![]() table.sort( TABLE, function( a, b ) return a.loot > b.loot end ) :shrug: The code DEAD has given you is the code used. I did not say that I would have to recode it to go by upgrades rather than loot, I would just have to change the index it sorts by for that, but I am not going to make it sort by upgrades, but am rather plan to add another element to the gangs which will be the overall score of the gang, which will use an equation to base it on number of members, number of upgrades, level and amount of loot, and then it will order by that. Wouldnt this work table.sort( TABLE, function( a, b )
if a.level == b.level then
if a.upgrades == b.upgrades then
return a.loot > b.loot
else
return a.upgrades > b.upgrades
end
else
return a.level > b.level
end
end ) You're not meant to tell them that I can do it relatively easily smh ![]() ![]() only a joke please no demote |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
|