TOPIC: Rules (TTT) are lacking.

I just got warned for killing someone who admitted killing an innocent

Context. He was claiming that the innocent shot first (no proof) but was clear as day that he killed that said innocent player. Only thing that closely relates to this is rule 2.4

In the current situation the suspect has killed an innocent and the body has been identified as an inno. Are we allowed to kill on this situation or no?

I get that its easy to side with the admin who made this judgement that it was breaking the rules and I accept that. but in that case my warning should be removed due to this "rule" not existing in the rules we are supposed to play by

E: Just to add this is not something admins unanimously agree
*NAME RETRACTED* has no idea wether or not he should do anything.
Admin that punished me only warned me since he didnt see slay a warranted punsihement
*NAME RETRACTED* has let several cases pass by since according to him it was valid reason to kill

If admin in question lets me post their name I will edit this again

Thanks thats all

The killing of an innocent would be considered a valid KOS reason. Don't forget that at the end of rule 2.4 it states that you can question the user. This is because the other two can provide solutions to the situation themselves (if the body is identified and it turns out to be a traitor, the situation is solved and the person who killed them is proven. If the round ends, the person that was killed was obviously a traitor and the situation is solved.. In the cases where the situation is not solved, you need to question the user as to why they killed them. If that answer is lacking or they refuse, you can kill them. If you do not question them then, depending on the situation, it can be considered RDM. Unless they're blatantly a traitor you can kill them straight up, however in those situations rule 2.4 doesn't even apply in the first place.

What would be your ruling if the suspect would state "they shot me first"? Is it valid to kill them if this answer does not enough to convince you?

LonelyDodo wrote: It's a gray area, I find at least. Let me put it this way: I find punishing someone for it rather harsh.

Well i dont agree with LoneleyDodo but i really think that Detectives shouldnt be allowed to KOS on IDed bodies DNA from inno body, the questioning thing is so much better, all in all this is a "roleplaying" game.

LonelyDodo wrote: Your punishment if you don't believe them is karma loss, you don't need any harsher punishment. It's a pretty big traitorous act to kill an innocent and it would be pretty dumb if every traitor could get away with it by saying "he shot first".

Yea for my punishment I got a warning and I find it unfair. (and im applying for Moderator so I don't want warnings that serve no reason)

ImToppen wrote:
TTT isn't roleplay... who the fuck told you that.

ImToppen wrote: Bare in mind that some people do not have mics, it would be very unfair to them to be forced to type to question people only to be killed every time while typing.

Miia is best snekgirl wrote:
You should question people if you and that person is dead and only discuss that in death if you dont wanna be killed over and over again when talking to someone because i doubt your both gonna live the whole round every round.

CrankyBot wrote:
TTT is roleplay.... I don't know who the fuck told you that it wasn't.

CaptinF1rework wrote:
Get SSRP out of your head

CrankyBot wrote:
It is ropleplay, are you ok cranky or did someone hit your head

Mexi wrote:
Who the fuck roleplays in a game of Who’s The Fucking Traitor, don’t see a detective going round “Hey there you seen any suspicious activity?” “Yes Detective, someone was near the T room”

Like come thy fuckery on.

CrankyBot wrote:
Unless your retarded its blatantly obvious that TTT is a role-playing game mode, considering you spend your whole time role playing as a terrorist. In actuality there is more RP most of the time on TTT than SSRP.

CaptinF1rework wrote:
community manager btw

CaptinF1rework wrote:
Think you’ll find everyone just walks around the map waiting for the first indication of a reason to shoot

Xeronise wrote:
Forgot that one LOL.

CrankyBot wrote: We're you dropped on you head when you were born.
Or thrown headfirst at a wall.

MageJamy wrote:
Could ask you the same question